Browse regulations

Regulation provides transitional pension benefit rules for federal public service employees who left public service employment on or after January 1, 2000 to work for newly incorporated port corporations (former Local Port Corporations or Non-Corporate Port of Canada), treating them as Group 1 contributors and preserving certain pension benefits including survivor allowances, death benefits, and pensionable service calculations.

Obsolete 25-year-old transitional regulation covering a completed privatization event. No practical effect on current Canadians' prosperity, liberty, or competitiveness; maintaining dead letter creates legal clutter without consequence.

Time-bound regulation (2000-2016) for recovering federal equalization overpayments from provinces due to methodological data revisions and census updates, with complex per-province calculations and recovery limits.

Obsolete: all adjustment periods have expired, and most sections already repealed. Retaining creates unnecessary legal clutter and administrative burden without serving any current purpose. The complex one-off recovery mechanisms distort fiscal federalism and could be replaced by simpler, transparent equalization formulas.

Establishes scientific criteria (half-life, bioaccumulation factor, octanol-water partition coefficient) to classify substances as 'persistent' and 'bioaccumulative' based on OECD standards, creating definitions that trigger regulatory controls under environmental law.

Arbitrary thresholds (e.g., 182-day half-life) and centralized scientific authority distort innovation, impose compliance costs, and prevent evaluation of substances based on actual risk in specific contexts. Environmental protection can be achieved through liability rules and property rights enforcement rather than ex ante classifications.

Regulation document shows sections 1-5 have been repealed by SOR/2013-88. No active provisions remain to review.

The sections are already repealed and therefore irrelevant. The fact of repeal suggests the original provisions were likely flawed or unnecessary, as they were explicitly revoked by legislative authority.

Document consisting entirely of repealed regulatory provisions (SOR/2011-318, s. 806 and SOR/2006-340, s. 4). No active regulations remain.

Already repealed - represents zero regulatory burden, no justification for retention as active law. The repeal was completed in 2011, eliminating any prior costs or distortions these provisions may have created.

Establishes administrative monetary penalty system for contraventions of aeronautics regulations, including notice procedures, payment options, and maximum penalty amounts for individuals and corporations.

Creates bureaucratic enforcement mechanism that adds compliance costs without addressing safety outcomes, discourages innovation in aviation sector, and enables regulatory capture through penalty revenue generation rather than actual safety improvements.

Document indicates regulation sections 1 and 2 were repealed by SOR/2006-310, section 6. The original content is not provided.

These provisions are already repealed and have no legal effect. Keeping references to repealed sections in regulatory codes creates confusion, legal uncertainty, and administrative burden without any benefit. The repeal itself signals the regulation was either obsolete or flawed, and retaining empty壳 contributes nothing to governance.

This regulation updates references to the Public Service Labour Relations Act in other federal regulations to point to the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act, which replaced the former act. It applies to all references except those explicitly exempted in subsection (1).

Canadians would be worse off if this regulation was deleted because it would create legal uncertainty and inconsistency across federal regulations. Without this reference update, courts and employers would have to interpret outdated references to a defunct act, potentially leading to disputes about which legal framework applies to federal public sector labour relations. This creates administrative chaos and legal costs that would burden both taxpayers and public servants.

Marine pilotage licensing and certification regulations establishing medical fitness requirements, sea service experience, and examination standards for pilots operating in Canadian compulsory pilotage areas, including the Atlantic region with specific vessel and area exemptions.

Ensures maritime safety through qualified pilots who must meet medical fitness standards, demonstrate local navigational knowledge, and maintain current experience, preventing accidents that could cause environmental disasters, loss of life, and economic damage to Canada's shipping industry.

Military Police Code of Conduct regulating the behaviour of military police officers under the National Defence Act, establishing standards for lawful conduct, use of force, reporting requirements, and disciplinary procedures.

Military police require specific conduct standards to maintain public trust and operational effectiveness. Without these regulations, there would be no clear framework to prevent abuse of power, ensure accountability, or maintain professional standards in military law enforcement operations. The Code provides essential oversight mechanisms that protect both military personnel and civilians from potential misconduct while enabling effective security operations.

This appears to be a set of repealed regulations from SOR/2010-187, section 1, with no active provisions remaining.

Regulations are already repealed and obsolete, creating no value while maintaining unnecessary administrative overhead.

Regulation sets fees for Department of Public Works employees working on expropriation cases: twice the employee's hourly rate (prorated from annual salary based on 220 work days) plus 20% benefits, with interest on overdue amounts.

The 'twice hourly rate' multiplier is an arbitrary bureaucratic construct lacking economic rationale; it creates perverse incentives for overstaffing and overcharging, distorts cost-benefit analysis of expropriation decisions, and fails the Misesian test of serving consumer sovereignty. Genuine cost recovery should use transparent actual costs without artificial markups, or better yet, let market-determined pricing emerge through competitive procurement.

These Regulations establish transitional rules for pension benefits when a public service employee continues working for an entity ('withdrawing employer') that has been removed from the Public Service Superannuation Act. They clarify that service with the withdrawing employer counts as pensionable service, set death benefit entitlements, child allowance eligibility, and timing rules for benefit calculations.

This regulation extends public pension liabilities beyond the public sector, creating complex administrative burdens and unfunded obligations that distort labor markets. It forces the public pension system to cover private-sector employment, violating the principle that pension risks should be borne by the employer and employee directly involved. The regulatory complexity imposes compliance costs on withdrawing employers while creating moral hazard by allowing public service pension benefits to follow workers into private entities.

These regulations prescribe detailed procedural requirements for the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation (CDIC) when issuing notices related to vesting orders and receivership orders under the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation Act. They specify required notice content (dates, explanations, compensation basis, response instructions) and mandatory delivery methods (in-person, prepaid mail, messenger, fax/electronic) to various parties including shareholders, assignees, and federal member institutions.

This regulation imposes rigid, bureaucratic procedural requirements on CDIC's resolution processes, increasing administrative costs and reducing operational flexibility during time-sensitive bank failures. The mandated delivery methods and specific content requirements create unnecessary red tape that could delay resolution and increase costs to the financial system, while achieving no clear benefit over allowing CDIC discretion in communication methods. These formalities exemplify regulatory overreach into what should be a flexible, market-driven resolution process where efficiency and speed are paramount to preserving value and maintaining financial stability.

Establishes the DNA Data Bank Advisory Committee to advise the RCMP Commissioner on the operation of the national DNA data bank, composed of appointed members from police, legal, scientific, academic communities, and the Privacy Commissioner's office, with annual reporting requirements.

Creates an unnecessary bureaucratic layer that legitimizes and perpetuates the state's collection and use of citizens' DNA data. Advisory committees institutionalize surveillance and fail to prevent expansion of the DNA data bank despite well-documented privacy risks, mission creep, and potential for misuse. The expertise claimed could be obtained through ad hoc consultations without creating a permanent government apparatus that normalizes genetic profiling. Annual reporting creates administrative burden for no measurable public benefit, and political appointments risk capture by law enforcement interests over civil liberties.