Browse regulations

Regulation establishes a detailed administrative framework for dividing judicial pension benefits between judges and their spouses/common-law partners upon relationship breakdown, specifying application procedures, required documents, valuation methods, timelines, and annuity administrator responsibilities.

Imposes costly bureaucratic rigidity, inflexible technical rules, and perverse incentives that increase administrative overhead and encourage litigation over technical compliance; simpler mechanisms like general family law principles or private ordering would achieve fairer outcomes with far less regulatory burden.

This regulation establishes a sanctions regime against Zimbabwe, prohibiting exports of arms and related materials, restricting services, freezing assets of designated persons, and requiring reporting by financial institutions. It targets individuals and entities linked to the Government of Zimbabwe, ZANU-PF, or those undermining democracy and human rights in Zimbabwe.

Canadians would be worse off if this regulation was deleted because it prevents Canadian entities from unknowingly supporting human rights abuses, corruption, and undemocratic practices in Zimbabwe through financial transactions and arms transfers. The regulatory framework provides transparency and accountability mechanisms that would be difficult to maintain through voluntary compliance alone.

Regulation establishes registration centers and procedures for sex offenders subject to military law (Code of Service Discipline) or who are officers/non-commissioned members of the primary reserve. It designates military police stations and the Office of the Provost Marshal as registration centers, specifies reporting requirements (initially in-person, updates via phone/fax/email for certain reports), authorizes military police to collect and register information, and designates Special Operations Forces units for National Defence Act purposes.

Military personnel exist under a separate legal jurisdiction (Code of Service Discipline) with unique mobility patterns including overseas deployments and base transfers. Civilian sex offender registration systems lack the infrastructure and authority to track military members across defence establishments and international postings. This regulation ensures monitoring without compromising operational security. Deleting it would create enforcement gaps as military sex offenders would fall between civilian and military systems, potentially allowing evasion of registration requirements.

This regulation grants remission of customs duties to specific companies for products imported for processing during specified years, with claims due by December 31, 2010.

This targeted duty remission creates regulatory favoritism, distorts market competition, and establishes precedent for politically-motivated trade interventions rather than uniform tariff policy.

This document consists entirely of 19 repealed regulatory sections, previously repealed by SOR/2016-187, section 17. There is no current regulatory content to review.

Already repealed and therefore irrelevant; no current regulation exists to assess for retention.

The Wage Earner Protection Program Regulations implement a government program that pays unpaid wages to employees when their employer becomes bankrupt or enters receivership. The regulations define eligible wages, application procedures, eligibility criteria (excluding those with controlling interest or managerial positions), payment allocation priorities, deadlines, reporting requirements for trustees/receivers, and administrative details including inflation-adjusted fee schedules for trustees.

This program violates individual responsibility and property rights by socializing business failure losses through compulsory taxation. It creates moral hazard: employees don't price employment risk into wages, and employers face reduced market discipline knowing workers have a government backstop. The unseen costs include distorted wage signals, higher taxes that suppress productivity, interference with voluntary creditor priority arrangements in bankruptcy, and a permanent bureaucracy. Employees can protect themselves through wage premiums for risk, private insurance, or selective employment—voluntary mechanisms that correctly price risk without coercion. The regulation perpetuates the flawed premise that the state must shield individuals from the consequences of their own choices in accepting employment risk.

Regulation establishes procedural framework for review panel hearings under the Pest Control Products Act, detailing requirements for filing objections, criteria for panel member selection (scientific expertise, conflict of interest rules, no recent government employment), hearing procedures, and confidentiality safeguards for sensitive information.

This procedural regulation adds bureaucratic overhead to an already restrictive pesticide approval regime. While it creates an appeal mechanism, it institutionalizes government control over what private landowners can use on their property. The 'scientific review' premise assumes regulators can centrally assess risks better than property owners and market actors, creating moral hazard and shielding decision-makers from liability. True liberty requires eliminating the underlying licensing system, not perfecting its appeals process.

The regulation consists of 9 sections, all of which have been repealed by SOR/2016-252, s. 27. There are no remaining substantive provisions.

The regulation is already repealed and has no legal effect. Maintaining repealed statutes on the books creates confusion and unnecessary complexity. Repeal indicates the regulation was likely flawed, unnecessary, or outdated.

Designates Manitoba for federal criminal code provisions related to payday lending, activating specific provincial payday loan regulations and consumer protection amendments effective October 18, 2010.

Creates regulatory framework that restricts payday lending supply, increasing costs for vulnerable borrowers who may need emergency credit, while potentially driving lending underground or to less regulated channels.

This regulation incorporates Nova Scotia provincial laws (Summary Proceedings Act and Interpretation Act) by reference for prosecutions under the Donkin Coal Block Development Opportunity Act, allowing federal prosecutors to use Nova Scotia's procedural and interpretive framework in coal block development cases.

This regulation creates unnecessary federal-provincial overlap by incorporating provincial laws for federal prosecutions. It adds regulatory complexity without clear benefit, as federal prosecutors could already use provincial procedures through existing legal frameworks. The regulation represents regulatory creep that burdens the legal system with redundant procedural requirements.

This federal regulation incorporates Nova Scotia's laws (with adaptations) to govern the exploitation of the Donkin coal block. It applies specified provincial statutes and regulations, with exceptions, and automatically includes future provincial regulations made after its commencement via incorporation by reference.

It automatically subjects the Donkin coal block to all future Nova Scotia regulations without democratic review or cost-benefit analysis, creating an open-ended expansion of regulatory burden that distorts incentives, increases uncertainty, and raises barriers to resource development. The perpetual incorporation mechanism prevents systematic assessment of each regulation's marginal costs versus benefits, violating principles of limited government and predictable rule of law.

Federal regulation applying Nova Scotia labour and human rights laws to the Donkin coal block mine while excluding it from the Canada Labour Code, with adapted provisions.

Creates unnecessary regulatory complexity and jurisdictional confusion. If the mine is in Nova Scotia, provincial laws should apply directly; if on federal land, applying provincial laws via federal regulation is a convoluted workaround that increases compliance costs and legal uncertainty without a clear, principled justification.

This regulation imposes extensive technical requirements on federal storage tank systems containing petroleum products, including mandatory secondary containment, regular leak detection testing, certification of equipment, and phased removal of older single-walled tanks regardless of condition. It applies to federal departments, airports, ports, railways, and federal lands, and incorporates detailed industry standards by reference.

The regulation imposes crushing compliance costs through rigid, one-size-fits-all technical specifications that cannot account for site-specific risk profiles. It mandates removal of functional equipment based solely on installation date rather than actual condition, wasting taxpayers' money and distorting maintenance incentives. The environmental protection goals could be achieved more efficiently through strict liability and performance-based standards that allow operators flexibility in meeting objectives while internalizing the full costs of any contamination.

Regulation establishes certification requirements for Drug Recognition Experts (DREs) and standardizes field sobriety and drug impairment evaluation procedures under the Criminal Code, requiring IACP accreditation and prescribing specific tests including horizontal gaze nystagmus, walk-and-turn, one-leg stand, and comprehensive physiological examinations.

Deletion would eliminate standardized, scientifically-validated protocols essential for reliable drug-impaired driving detection. The IACP certification ensures officer competency, while uniform procedures protect against arbitrary enforcement and wrongful accusations—outcomes that ad-hoc approaches cannot achieve with comparable reliability or legal defensibility.

This regulation governs the Canada Disability Savings Program, providing government grants and bonds to match private contributions to Registered Disability Savings Plans (RDSPs) for people with disabilities. It sets eligibility criteria (age under 49, DTC-eligible, contribution limits), establishes an 'assistance holdback amount' that triggers clawbacks, defines complex repayment obligations when plans terminate, beneficiaries die, cease to be DTC-eligible, or make withdrawals, prescribes extensive issuer reporting requirements, and mandates that financial institutions enter into detailed issuer agreements with the Minister.

This regulation creates perverse incentives that trap beneficiaries in dependency by penalizing work, savings, and self-sufficiency through punitive clawback mechanisms (3:1 repayment ratio on withdrawals). The complex 'assistance holdback' system discourages accessing needed funds, violates property rights by allowing government to reclaim private contributions, and creates Byzantine compliance burdens for financial institutions. The DTC-eligibility requirement excludes deserving individuals based on bureaucratic classifications while linking benefits to continued disability status, directly opposing recovery. The regulation's complexity generates unseen administrative costs that ultimately reduce program effectiveness and increase financial instrument costs for all. Private charitable solutions, family support networks, and voluntary disability insurance markets would provide more flexible, dignified, and efficient support without these destructive incentives.