Browse regulations

A retroactive tax remission order for specific Indigenous individuals owning designated lots in Whitehorse, Yukon (McIntyre Lands), excusing taxes paid from 1999-2005 on the basis that these properties should have been treated as reserves. It excludes those enrolled under a Yukon First Nations Final Agreement.

Creates a narrow, retroactive tax break that distorts land market incentives, undermines tax system neutrality, and sets a precedent for special-interest relief. The underlying land designation issue should be resolved through formal, prospective legislation rather than targeted exemptions that violate equal treatment under law.

Excise Tax Indexing Ratio Regulations: Historical regulation specifying indexing ratios for excise tax adjustments on September 1, 1983 (1.35559 and 1.37078) and September 1, 1984 (1.99924 and 1.88464) under the Excise Tax Act.

Repealed and obsolete. This regulation dealt with one-time historical adjustments from 1983-1984 and has no current legal effect. Even when active, it was a narrow technical formula with no enduring rationale.

This document shows sections 1 through 5 of a regulation, all of which have been repealed by Statutory Instrument 2008-26, section 5. The original content of these sections is not provided, only their repeal status.

These sections are already repealed, confirming their obsolescence. Their collective repeal suggests they were flawed regulations that restricted liberty and created unintended consequences contrary to prosperity. Keeping repealed sections on the books creates confusion and regulatory clutter; their deletion was justified.

This document shows sections 1-4 of a regulation that have already been repealed by SI/2008-20, s. 5. The original regulation's content is not visible, only its repealed status.

Already repealed. The fact that Parliament previously repealed these sections indicates recognition of the regulation's obsolescence or adverse effects. Keeping repealed provisions on the books creates legal uncertainty and administrative burden for no benefit.

Prescribes eligible relocation expenses for federal judges under the Judges Act, including travel, household effects transport, temporary lodging, real estate transaction costs, mortgage interest differentials, bridge loan interest, and losses on home sales below appraised value up to 10%.

Taxpayer-funded relocation benefits for judges constitute an unjust wealth transfer with significant hidden costs: moral hazard reducing cost sensitivity, precedent for expanding privileged public sector entitlements that distort labor markets, and increased tax burden without commensurate public benefit. Judges are already highly compensated; such benefits neither attract talent nor serve essential government functions.

This regulation consists of three sections, all of which have been repealed by SOR/2008-316. The original provisions are no longer in force.

The regulation is already fully repealed and has no current legal effect; it contributes nothing to Canada's regulatory burden and need not be considered further.

Entirely repealed regulation with no remaining substantive provisions. All sections were revoked by SOR/2008-31.

Already repealed and irrelevant. No regulatory burden exists. Original provisions were removed for cause, indicating they were flawed or unnecessary.

These regulations govern the use of federal canals in Quebec and Ontario, imposing permit requirements, user fees (wharfage, storage, wintering), detailed operational rules (speed limits, mooring, equipment, navigation procedures), and granting extensive discretionary authority to canal officials to manage traffic, deny passage, and enforce compliance. The stated purpose is to ensure safe, orderly, and efficient navigation and to protect canal infrastructure.

The regulation imposes costly administrative burdens (permits, reporting), rigid operational constraints, and user fees that reduce canal utilization and stifle interprovincial commerce. Its discretionary powers invite abuse, while special exemptions distort fairness. The unseen cost is the suppression of a potentially vibrant private waterway system that could thrive under market-based management and liability rules.

This regulation contains only repealed provisions, indicating it has been completely removed from effect by SOR/2008-120, section 22. No active regulatory content remains.

The regulation is already repealed and contains no active provisions, making it obsolete regulatory text that should be removed to reduce legal complexity and eliminate unnecessary bureaucratic overhead.

Regulates direct mail solicitations to prevent deceptive billing practices by requiring clear disclosure notices on mail that resembles invoices or statements of account.

Prevents consumer fraud and deception in direct mail marketing, protecting vulnerable individuals from being tricked into paying for unsolicited goods or services based on misleading billing appearances.

Regulation provides free postal service for materials intended for blind individuals, including Braille, sound recordings, and other accessible formats, when mailed by or to recognized blind institutions. It sets size/weight limits, labeling requirements, and mandates acceptance for registered/Xpresspost mail at no charge.

This mandate forces Canada Post to provide free services, creating a cross-subsidy that increases costs for all other postal customers and distorts market pricing. The bureaucratic complexity of size limits, labeling rules, and weight restrictions adds unintended compliance burdens. Access for blind Canadians could be achieved more efficiently through private charity, voluntary postal discounts, or digital alternatives, without coercive redistribution. Even well-intentioned interventions create unseen costs and dependency.

These regulations were repealed in 2007 under SOR/2007-303, section 44. They were previously in effect but are no longer active law.

Repealed regulations are obsolete and no longer in effect. The repeal indicates they were either unnecessary or replaced by more effective measures. Maintaining repealed regulations would create regulatory clutter and potential confusion without any benefit to Canadians.

Regulations governing navigation, safety, and environmental protection in Leamy Lake navigation channel, including boat operation rules, capacity limits, and enforcement mechanisms

Creates unnecessary bureaucracy for a local waterway; safety and environmental protection could be achieved through voluntary compliance and private management without government micromanagement of boat entry, wake control, and fuel handling

This permit authorizes the export of controlled chemical mixtures (CWC toxic chemicals and precursors) from Canada, with specific concentration limits and documentation requirements for tracking and compliance.

Without this regulation, Canada would lack controls on potentially dangerous chemical exports that could be used for weapons development or harmful purposes. The documentation requirements help track chemical flows and prevent misuse, while the concentration thresholds balance legitimate commercial use with security concerns.

Permit authorizing Canadian residents to export specific toxic chemicals and precursors to the United States, with conditions including six-year document retention, officer access, and specific reporting codes in customs forms.

Imposes unnecessary compliance costs and bureaucratic burdens on legitimate trade with an ally that has its own robust controls, distorting incentives and reducing economic efficiency without significant security justification; unseen effects include discouraging business activity and creating opportunities for regulatory overreach.