Browse regulations

Airport zoning regulation for North Battleford Airport that restricts building heights and land use within defined imaginary surfaces (approach, outer, transitional) and prohibits waste that attracts birds, to ensure aviation safety.

Uncompensated taking of property rights that restricts land supply and development. Safety can be achieved through market mechanisms like liability and voluntary easement purchases. Represents harmful government planning that replaces voluntary exchange with arbitrary restrictions, contrary to Mises-Hayek-Friedman principles.

Mandates a 75-cent per metric tonne levy on Saskatchewan canola producers for interprovincial and export trade, collected by buyers through deduction and remitted to the Saskatchewan Canola Development Commission. Buyers must provide producer details including Canadian Wheat Board ID numbers.

Violates liberty and private property by forcing producers to fund a commission regardless of consent or benefit received. Creates an interprovincial trade barrier on canola, contradicting free market principles. Administrative burden on buyers and producers; if the commission provides value, it should be funded voluntarily like private associations. Compulsory check-offs are 20th-century collectivist thinking incompatible with 21st-century prosperity.

This regulation protects Canadian companies from U.S. extraterritorial measures that restrict trade with Cuba, requiring notification of such communications to the Attorney General and prohibiting compliance with U.S. restrictions on Cuba-related trade.

This regulation defends Canadian sovereignty and protects Canadian businesses from foreign interference in their legitimate trade relationships. Without it, U.S. extraterritorial laws would impose American foreign policy on Canadian companies, restricting their ability to trade freely with Cuba and undermining Canada's independent foreign policy.

This Order defines which allowances are excluded from the 'wage rate' calculation under the Public Sector Compensation Act, applying to specific employee groups listed in Schedule II when paid under circumstances described in their collective agreements (referenced in Schedule I).

Deleting this definitional order would create legal uncertainty in administering the Public Sector Compensation Act, leading to disputes and inconsistent application of compensation rules. The regulation provides necessary precision for a complex area without restricting liberty or distorting market incentives. Its removal would increase administrative costs and litigation rather than expanding freedom.

Specifies how to calculate regulatory capital for trust and loan companies, defining eligible components (shareholders' equity, minority interests, subordinated indebtedness) with quality criteria (subordination, minimum five-year term, no early redemption) and deductions to avoid double-counting of investments in insurance or securities dealers.

Deletion would create opacity in capital measurement, undermining supervision and increasing risk of institution failures that harm depositors and the economy; standardized quality thresholds and double-counting prevention are essential and cannot be easily replicated by private monitoring given deposit insurance and complexity.

Defines how insurance companies must calculate their regulatory capital, which is the financial buffer to ensure they can meet policyholder obligations. Specifies eligible components (minority interests, subordinated debt, asset-liability excess, deferred capital gains for life insurers) minus goodwill, and requires subordination to policy liabilities with a minimum 5-year term for certain securities.

Without this prudential requirement, insurers could overstate capital quality and take excessive risks, leading to insolvencies that would leave policyholders unprotected. The regulation ensures capital is genuinely available to absorb losses, is subordinate to policyholder claims, and cannot evaporate during crises—protecting millions of Canadians who rely on insurance for health, life, and property security.

This regulation establishes capital adequacy requirements for cooperative credit associations (e.g., credit unions), defining regulatory capital as members' equity, shareholders' equity, minority interests, and subordinated indebtedness less goodwill, with adjustments that deduct exposures to insurance companies and securities dealers controlled by the association. It sets conditions for instruments to qualify as capital, including subordination and minimum five-year terms.

Deleting these prudential capital requirements would allow cooperative credit associations to operate with insufficient buffers against losses, particularly from associated insurance or securities activities. This would endanger depositor funds, increase systemic risk, and likely lead to costly bailouts—outcomes that far exceed compliance costs. The regulation achieves financial stability by ensuring loss-absorbing capacity; market discipline alone is inadequate given deposit insurance and contagion risks.

This regulation establishes fees for using the Food Research and Development Centre's facilities and personnel services, including hourly rates for facility use, personnel fees, overtime charges, and specific fees for permeability testing of food packaging materials.

This regulation creates artificial scarcity by imposing government-set fees on research services that could be provided more efficiently by private sector alternatives, distorting market signals and preventing competitive pricing that would optimize resource allocation in food research and development.

This regulation establishes the Federal Referendum Fees Tariff, setting compensation rates for referendum officers, support staff, and service providers involved in conducting federal referendums in Canada. It covers fees for returning officers, assistant returning officers, enumerators, polling staff, printing services, and travel expenses, with rates varying by population size and specific duties performed.

This regulation codifies a complex, centralized system of referendum administration that could be streamlined through market mechanisms and voluntary arrangements. The extensive fee schedules and mandated compensation create unnecessary bureaucracy, distort incentives, and impose costs on taxpayers without clear evidence of superior outcomes compared to decentralized alternatives. The regulation's complexity itself becomes a barrier to efficient referendum administration.

Procedural rule governing applications under Criminal Code section 745 for reduction in parole ineligibility periods. Establishes detailed processes for filing, service, preliminary hearings, parole eligibility reports, jury empanelment, and hearing procedures in Prince Edward Island Supreme Court.

This is a purely procedural court rule that imposes administrative costs and delays without enhancing substantive justice. The detailed requirements for applications, affidavits, service, reports, and hearings consume judicial resources and correctional bureaucracy for what should be a streamlined determination. The rule creates unnecessary complexity that increases taxpayer costs and delays resolution of parole eligibility. The same procedural fairness objectives could be achieved through simpler, less burdensome processes that reduce the regulatory burden on the justice system.

Regulations define commercial loans, subsidiaries, and asset calculations for cooperative credit associations, establishing criteria for widely distributed securities and international agencies for lending purposes.

These regulations provide essential clarity for financial institutions to operate safely, preventing excessive risk-taking while enabling legitimate lending operations. Without them, cooperative credit associations would lack standardized definitions needed for regulatory compliance and risk management.

Defines terms for Trust and Loan Companies Act: 'commercial loan' (widely distributed criteria and prescribed international agencies), 'prescribed subsidiaries' (all subsidiaries), and 'total assets' (balance sheet per superintendent's standards) to apply sections 461 and 462.

It imposes unnecessary complexity and compliance costs while restricting beneficial lending (e.g., intra-group, to certain agencies), reducing credit supply, raising borrowing costs, and distorting market incentives, exacerbating housing affordability issues and contributing to the brain drain without offsetting benefits.

Regulation prohibits construction exceeding defined approach, outer, and transitional surfaces within 4km radius of Repulse Bay Airport (NWT) to protect aircraft from obstructions during takeoff/landing.

Deletion would endanger lives by permitting structures that could cause aviation accidents; zoning achieves safety through clear, objective standards more efficiently than post-harm litigation.

This regulation defines 'affiliated persons' for trust and loan companies under the Trust and Loan Companies Act, establishing criteria including employment relationships, share ownership, borrower status (above thresholds of $200k/0.02% capital for individuals, $500k/0.05% capital/25% assets for entities), service provider relationships exceeding 10% of provider's billings, non-performing loans, and family relationships. It expands regulatory oversight to a comprehensive network of connected parties.

The regulation imposes disproportionate compliance costs and distorts legitimate market relationships through arbitrary thresholds and overly broad definitions. It captures numerous low-risk relationships (spouses, service providers with 10%+ billings, borrowers just above fixed cutoffs) while failing to target actual risks. Private market mechanisms—due diligence, reputation, contract enforcement, corporate governance, and common law fraud remedies—already address affiliate concerns more efficiently. The fixed dollar thresholds create credit allocation distortions, and the comprehensive scope fosters over-compliance culture over substantive risk management.

These regulations define affiliated persons for insurance companies under the Insurance Companies Act, establishing criteria for when individuals or entities are considered affiliated based on relationships, financial interests, and business connections to the company.

This regulation helps prevent conflicts of interest and self-dealing in the insurance industry by clearly defining when someone is considered affiliated with a company. Without these definitions, insurance companies could engage in risky lending practices to insiders, potentially endangering policyholders' interests and financial stability. The criteria protect consumers by ensuring that those with significant financial relationships or control over the company are subject to appropriate regulatory scrutiny.