Browse regulations

Grants retroactive tax remission to specific individuals (members of Hidden Valley Golf Resort Association in Alberta) for taxes paid on annual maintenance fees between October 1992 and January 1999. The remission is conditional on application within two years of the Order and that the amount hasn't been otherwise rebated.

This special-interest legislation grants discriminatory tax relief to a narrow, named group while other Canadians with similar circumstances receive none. It exemplifies regulatory cronyism that violates equal treatment under the law, imposes administrative costs, and creates precedent for politically-motivated exceptions. The regulation is also functionally obsolete (time limits expired) and should be repealed to clean the statute books.

Provincial Court of Newfoundland and Labrador Criminal Procedure Rules establishing court procedures, document formats, filing requirements, and hearing processes for criminal proceedings in Newfoundland and Labrador

These are procedural court rules specific to one province that create unnecessary regulatory complexity. They increase legal costs through complex filing requirements, delay justice with procedural hurdles, and create barriers to access that disproportionately affect those without legal representation. The detailed formatting requirements and strict timelines serve no public safety purpose but increase compliance costs and create opportunities for technical dismissals.

Grants remission of charges and interest under the Northern Pipeline Act to Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd. for specific invoices from September 30 and December 31, 2004, providing targeted financial relief to one company.

Selective corporate welfare violates equal treatment, distorts competition, and sets precedent for favoritism. The remission represents government picking winners, creating unfair advantage, and undermining market-based competition that drives prosperity.

This regulation defines specific geographic boundaries in Alberta (Areas B and C on Plan 951-0828), totaling approximately 45,807 hectares, with mineral rights excepted.

This appears to be a purely descriptive land survey designation with no regulatory content, economic purpose, or policy mechanism. It serves only to identify geographic boundaries without any stated objective or mechanism for achieving public benefit, making it unnecessary regulatory overhead.

Agreement between Canada and Slovakia for social security cooperation, establishing coordination of pension benefits, totalization of creditable periods, and administrative arrangements for benefit payment across jurisdictions.

This agreement prevents double taxation and ensures pension benefits for citizens who worked in both countries. Canadians would lose retirement security and face administrative chaos if repealed, as cross-border workers would need to navigate conflicting systems without harmonized rules.

Social security agreement between Canada and Czech Republic to coordinate pension benefits, allowing totalization of creditable periods and ensuring benefits for persons who have contributed to both systems

This international agreement facilitates mobility between Canada and Czech Republic for workers, preventing loss of pension benefits when people move between countries. It serves a legitimate diplomatic and social purpose that would be hard to replicate through unilateral measures.

International social security agreement between Canada and Sweden to coordinate pension benefits and creditable periods across both countries, ensuring citizens can receive benefits while living in either country and preventing double taxation of social security contributions.

International social security agreements create bureaucratic complexity, increase administrative costs, and restrict individual mobility. These agreements lock citizens into government pension systems and prevent private alternatives from emerging. The costs of maintaining these agreements outweigh the benefits, as they primarily serve to prop up inefficient government pension schemes rather than enhance individual liberty or economic efficiency.

A bilateral social security agreement between Canada and Australia to coordinate pension benefits and creditable periods for residents who have lived in both countries, ensuring cross-border payment of benefits and preventing double taxation of contributions.

Canadians would be worse off if this agreement was deleted as it protects pension benefits for those who have lived in both countries, prevents loss of earned benefits, and ensures fair treatment of cross-border residents. The coordination mechanisms are complex but necessary for the 250,000+ Canadians living in Australia and vice versa.

This Order withdraws specific subsurface lands near Bluefish Lake, Northwest Territories from disposal to enable a hydroelectric power plant. It protects pre-existing mining claims, exploration licenses, production licenses, quarrying rights, and surface leases while preventing new interests that could interfere.

Deletion would expose the site to new mining claims, jeopardizing the hydroelectric project and its benefits of clean energy and economic development. The withdrawal achieves its goal efficiently by temporarily reserving the land without infringing existing rights—a targeted measure that balances public infrastructure needs with property rights.

This regulation establishes controlled access zones around Canadian defence establishments and naval installations, permitting the Minister of National Defence to designate specific water areas where access can be controlled, persons and property searched, and conditions imposed for safety and security purposes. It applies to harbours at Halifax, Esquimalt, and Nanoose, and grants powers to security guards while imposing procedural safeguards including notice requirements, same-sex searches, and limitations on force.

Canadians would be worse off without this regulation because military installations would lack clear legal authority to secure against threats, compromising national defence. The regulation achieves its security objective through a narrowly-tailored framework that balances safety needs with individual rights via requirements for reasonable necessity, same-sex searches, proportional force, and public notice—making it an appropriate exercise of the state's core defence function that cannot be replicated without explicit legal authority.

This supplementary agreement amends Canada's 1985 social security treaty with Germany, updating definitions, pension calculation methods, coverage rules, and information sharing to coordinate benefits for citizens with cross-border work histories.

Canadians with work histories in both countries would face severe financial harm from coverage gaps, double contributions, and lost pension credits without this coordination. While social security itself is problematic, unilateral withdrawal would immediately strand mobile citizens, creating concrete losses that far outweigh the treaty's minimal administrative burden.

This regulation appears to be a land survey designation for specific lots in Inuvik, Northwest Territories, referencing official survey records and land title filings. It defines boundaries and locations of properties along Shell Lake without imposing any substantive regulatory requirements or restrictions.

This is merely a technical land survey reference document that creates no regulatory burden, imposes no restrictions, and serves no active regulatory purpose. It simply references existing survey records and title filings that would remain available even if this specific designation were removed. The costs of keeping it include unnecessary bureaucratic complexity and potential confusion about whether these properties have special status beyond what's already recorded in official land title systems.

This regulation grants remission (refund) of GST/HST taxes collected on eligible supplies made between January 1, 1991 and April 23, 1996 by eligible registrants who made an election under section 227 of the Excise Tax Act. It also remits related interest and penalties, with applications due within 2 years of the order's effective date.

Obsolete: The eligible period ended April 23, 1996, and applications were required within 2 years of the order's making. This regulation has no practical effect on current Canadians and creates unnecessary regulatory clutter. Even when active, it was a narrow retrospective relief measure that adds complexity without serving any current policy objective.

Retroactive tax remission order for accredited foreign missions to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in Canada for the period April 1, 2002 onward, refunding GST/HST paid in excess of what would have been owed if diplomatic tax privileges had applied.

Creates discriminatory tax treatment, retroactively rewrites tax liabilities, and establishes a precedent for special-interest refunds that violates horizontal equity. The administrative burden of processing claims for over 20 years of transactions is wasteful. International diplomatic tax exemptions should be handled prospectively through clear legislation or treaties, not retroactive admin orders. If these missions were improperly taxed, a general amnesty or prospective relief would be fairer than this targeted carve-out.

Agreement between Canada and Hungary to coordinate social security benefits, allowing creditable periods from one country to count toward benefits in the other, with provisions for totalization, administrative cooperation, and protection of rights for persons moving between countries.

Canadians would be worse off if this agreement was deleted because it protects their social security benefits when working or retiring in Hungary, prevents benefit reductions for cross-border residents, and ensures administrative cooperation for benefit claims. The coordination mechanisms would be difficult to replicate bilaterally without this formal framework.