Browse regulations

Tax remission order for Champagne and Aishihik First Nations under self-government agreement, covering tax paid from October 1997 to October 2000 with specific refund conditions.

This is a targeted tax remission for a specific Indigenous self-government agreement that ensures treaty obligations are met. Deleting it would breach contractual commitments and create legal uncertainty for First Nations governance arrangements.

Remission of GST paid by Selkirk First Nation members during 1997-2000 period under self-government agreement, conditional on no refund under Yukon First Nations Act.

Removes discriminatory tax burden on Indigenous self-government implementation; repealing would force First Nations to pay taxes they were exempted from under negotiated agreements, violating federal treaty obligations.

Tax remission order for Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation providing GST refunds for taxes paid Oct 1997-Oct 2000, implementing self-government agreement terms, conditional on no other refund under Yukon First Nations Self-Government Act.

Obsolete historical carve-out that creates unequal tax treatment; serves no current purpose but sets precedent for special exemptions, undermining uniform rule of law.

Exempts railway running-trades employees (engineers, conductors, brakemen, etc.) from standard hours of work and rest period requirements under the Canada Labour Code, allowing flexible scheduling without regard to sections 169, 171, and 173.

Railway operations demand 24/7 scheduling and rest patterns tailored to safety and service needs that rigid labor standards would disrupt. This exemption enables market-driven scheduling, reduces compliance burdens, and maintains competitiveness of an essential transportation sector. Removing it would increase costs, reduce operational flexibility, and potentially harm both safety and efficiency.

This regulation establishes working hour standards for motor vehicle operators (bus, city, and highway) under the Canada Labour Code, modifying standard 40-hour workweek provisions to allow longer hours (up to 60 hours/week for highway operators) and providing special provisions for multi-class employment and holiday calculations.

These regulations distort labor markets by preventing natural wage adjustments for longer hours, create compliance complexity for employers, and interfere with voluntary agreements between drivers and companies. The stated safety benefits are better achieved through market competition and insurance incentives rather than rigid hour limits.

The North Bay Airport Zoning Regulations establish imaginary airspace surfaces (approach, outer, transitional) around North Bay Airport and prohibit construction or natural growth that exceeds these surfaces. It also bans bird-attracting waste disposal on regulated lands. The regulations define specific geographic boundaries and technical dimensions for runways and safety zones based on Department of Transport Plan T-2743 (1970).

This regulation prevents a catastrophic public safety hazard by restricting property rights to maintain clear airspace around the airport. Aviation accidents have massive externalities affecting passengers, people on the ground, and the broader economy. The airport operator cannot feasibly purchase development rights from all surrounding landowners, and individual property owners lack the information and incentives to properly account for aviation safety risks. The restriction is narrowly tailored to specific technical airspace corridors essential for safe flight operations, making it a legitimate exercise of state authority to prevent harm to others.

Federal licensing regime for projects affecting rivers crossing Canada's border, requiring Ministerial approval based on detailed applications, economic analysis, and compliance conditions; minimal-impact projects (<3cm level or <0.3 m3/s flow) are exempted but must be notified.

The regulation imposes a licensing monopoly that blocks voluntary agreements and entrepreneurial water projects, increasing costs and uncertainty while giving bureaucrats power to reject based on vague criteria. Its unseen effects include permanently lost opportunities for power, irrigation, and development, while actual harms could be addressed through liability and contract law. This central control reduces supply, stifles innovation, and harms Canadian prosperity.

This regulation establishes strict height restrictions on buildings, structures, and natural growth within a large area surrounding Mirabel airport to ensure aviation safety. It defines imaginary surfaces (approach, outer, transitional) that no object may penetrate, prohibits owners from allowing trees/vegetation to exceed these surfaces, and grants the Minister power to order removal of violations. The regulation applies to thousands of specific land parcels across multiple municipalities, effectively sterilizing vast areas of private property.

This regulation constitutes an uncompensated taking of property rights that destroys billions in economic value and development potential. While aviation safety is legitimate, this blanket prohibition across thousands of privately-owned parcels is the most restrictive, least efficient solution. Less restrictive alternatives exist: liability law already incentivizes safe development; the airport could purchase development rights or easements from willing sellers; height restrictions could be tied to actual risk rather than arbitrary imaginary surfaces. The regulation creates severe unintended consequences: permanent suppression of housing supply in Quebec's most developable regions, massive deadweight loss, incentive distortions that prevent mutually beneficial agreements, and government planning that overrides decentralized knowledge. The same safety outcomes could be achieved through market mechanisms that respect property rights rather than eliminating them.

Establishes the Preparatory Commission for Metric Conversion to advise on plans for converting Canada to the metric system, conduct studies, coordinate across sectors, and recommend legislative action.

Completely obsolete—Canada's metric conversion was completed decades ago. This commission serves no function today, yet continues to exist as an unnecessary regulatory burden consuming administrative resources and perpetuating bureaucratic inertia.

Establishes the General Adjustment Assistance Board to provide loans, loan insurance, consulting grants, and stock options to manufacturers facing international trade competition or market access challenges, with oversight mechanisms and eligibility criteria for Canadian businesses.

Creates a costly government bureaucracy that distorts market signals, crowds out private lending, and provides politically motivated subsidies to selected manufacturers while imposing regulatory burdens on businesses that must navigate complex eligibility requirements.

This regulation establishes a government loan program administered by the General Adjustment Assistance Board to provide financial assistance (loans up to $1.5M, higher for mergers) to footwear and tanning manufacturers for restructuring activities, contingent onBoard-approved consultant analyses and security requirements.

Corporate subsidies distort market signals, misallocate capital, and create moral hazard. Taxpayer funds prop up specific industries rather than allowing resources to flow to their most productive uses. This regulation locks in 1974-era manufacturers, prevents creative destruction, and imposes unseen costs through higher taxes or reduced public spending elsewhere. The stated goal of 'assisting restructuring' is better achieved through market competition than government lending.

Federal program providing loans and insurance to manufacturers for restructuring, international competition, and market access, with government backing of private lenders and stock options in assisted companies

Creates market distortions by shielding private lenders from risk, encourages inefficient businesses to survive on government support rather than market competition, and diverts resources from productive uses to politically connected industries

These regulations provide special government insurance for loans made by private lenders to lease computer products manufactured by Consolidated Computer Inc., a specific Ontario corporation. The insurance covers up to 99% of loans not exceeding $30 million in aggregate, with special provisions for early repayment losses.

This regulation creates market distortion by providing special government backing for one specific company's products, giving it an unfair competitive advantage over other computer manufacturers. It distorts capital allocation, risks taxpayer money on a single corporation, and establishes a dangerous precedent of government picking winners in the technology sector.

This regulation provides insurance for private loans to lease computer products manufactured by Consolidated Computer Inc., a Canadian corporation, with insurance coverage up to 99% of loan amounts not exceeding $30 million total. It modifies the General Adjustment Assistance Regulations to allow higher insurance coverage and different repayment terms for this specific company.

This is a targeted subsidy for a specific company that distorts market competition, creates moral hazard by encouraging risky lending, and represents regulatory capture. It artificially props up one firm at taxpayer expense while other computer manufacturers compete without such advantages, ultimately harming consumers and reducing overall economic efficiency.

The Automotive Manufacturing Assistance Regulations establish a government-backed loan and guarantee program to support Canadian automotive parts manufacturers affected by the Canada-US Automotive Products Agreement, providing financial assistance to eligible manufacturers to modernize facilities, maintain operations, and protect jobs during industry transitions.

This regulation represents industrial policy that distorts market signals by directing capital to politically connected firms rather than letting market forces determine which manufacturers succeed. The loan guarantees and financial assistance create moral hazard, protect inefficient producers from competition, and ultimately increase costs for consumers while reducing overall economic efficiency. The stated goal of protecting jobs through government intervention ignores the unseen costs of misallocated resources and reduced innovation that would occur in a free market.