Browse regulations

The Investors' Indemnity Regulations establish a government insurance scheme compensating individuals for losses on Canadian government securities when they pay but don't receive the security or redemption fails. Claims require Finance investigation, with payments over $5,000 needing Treasury Board approval. Coverage is conditional on assigning claims to the Crown.

This scheme imposes costs through moral hazard, taxpayer liability, market distortion of private insurance, bureaucratic inefficiency, and coercive claim assignment. It is an improper government guarantee that undermines accountability and market mechanisms for addressing contract breaches.

Authorizes the Minister of National Defence to provide inspection services for defence materiel produced by Canadian industry for allied, foreign, and Commonwealth governments, with cost-recovery mechanisms and liability limitations.

This regulation enables Canada to maintain defence partnerships and secure international contracts for Canadian defence industry. Without it, Canadian manufacturers would be at a competitive disadvantage in global defence markets, potentially losing jobs and economic benefits from allied defence procurement.

These regulations govern the registration, transfer, and management of Canadian government bonds by the Bank of Canada, establishing procedures for ownership, payment of interest, and handling of lost/damaged bonds through a centralized registration system.

Canadians would be worse off if this regulation was deleted because it provides essential legal framework for secure government bond ownership and transfer, protecting investors' rights and ensuring orderly financial markets. The registration system prevents fraud and provides clear ownership records that would be difficult to replicate through private mechanisms.

Authorizes the Minister of National Defence to provide indemnity and release from tort claims for property owners, occupants, demolition contractors, and interested parties whose property is used for survival training exercises simulating nuclear blast or radioactive fallout scenarios.

This regulation facilitates essential military training for national security without exposing participants to excessive liability, ensuring Canada can prepare for extreme scenarios while protecting private property rights through indemnification mechanisms.

Authorizes the Minister of National Defence to lend or transfer Canadian defence materiel to friendly countries for test and evaluation purposes, with conditions including that transfers be restricted to consumable items or items to be tested to destruction, that loans and transfers be gratuitous unless otherwise decided, and requires annual reporting of loans exceeding one year or transfers valued over $25,000.

Without this regulation, the Minister would lack explicit authority to engage in international materiel loan/transfer for testing, limiting Canada's ability to participate in valuable defence cooperation and technology sharing. The regulation's conditions (friendly nations only, consumables/test-to-destruction, gratuitous transfers by default) provide essential safeguards against misuse or waste of public defence assets, while the reporting requirement ensures minimal accountability.

Regulations governing the loan of defence materiel (military equipment, supplies, etc.) from the Canadian government to various entities for purposes including disaster relief, law enforcement, international military cooperation, community organizations, government departments, educational institutions, and contractors, with provisions for charges, cost allocation, and terms of loan.

These regulations enable critical national security and public safety functions including disaster response, law enforcement support, international military cooperation, and efficient use of military resources. Deleting them would impair Canada's ability to respond to emergencies, maintain international defence relationships, and provide materiel to essential services during crises.

Authorizes the Minister of National Defence to lend military materiel to contractors of the Department of Supply and Services working on national defence projects, distinguishing between general equipment (to the Department) and prototypes/samples/models (directly to contractors). The Minister sets terms deemed appropriate for defence interests.

Canadians would be worse off because deletion would either force inefficient duplication of specialized testing/development equipment by contractors or require bearing full capital costs for temporary needs, inflating defence procurement costs. This administrative order enables efficient asset utilization without imposing new restrictions or creating regulatory burdens on private enterprise.

Authorizes the Minister of National Defence to transfer maps, charts, and related materials to other governments gratuitously, up to an annual value of $75,000, when deemed in the public interest.

Allows wasteful gratuitous transfers of taxpayer-owned assets without compensation, bypassing market mechanisms that would maximize value. The vague 'public interest' standard invites abuse and creates a moral hazard for giving away resources that could otherwise be sold or otherwise deployed productively.

This regulation authorizes the Minister of National Defence to rent out military floating equipment (tugs, derricks, flat scows) when commercial alternatives are unavailable, at prevailing market rates with standard indemnification terms.

This creates a government-run equipment rental business that competes with private operators, distorting market signals and potentially crowding out commercial providers. The stated purpose of renting when 'commercial facilities are not available' is self-defeating - if private equipment were truly unavailable, the government wouldn't need this regulation to create artificial supply. The indemnification clauses also expose taxpayers to liability while subsidizing military assets for private use.

Authorizes Minister of National Defence to loan clothing/equipment to Caribbean cadet officers and cadets visiting Canada under exchange arrangements, with provisions for retention of items for hygiene reasons or at reduced cost.

This regulation facilitates international military exchange programs that build diplomatic relationships and provide valuable cross-cultural training experiences for both Canadian and Caribbean cadets. The provisions for hygiene-sensitive items and cost recovery are practical mechanisms that serve the public interest without creating significant economic distortions.

Allows Canadian Forces dental officers to provide civilian dental care in emergencies, isolated areas, or at provincial licensing body request. Fees based on provincial dental association schedules, with Ministerial discretion for unusual cases. All fees collected go to the Receiver General (government).

Government competition with private dentists distorts markets, Crowds out private enterprise from serving isolated areas, Uses military resources for non-core civilian functions, Creates unnecessary bureaucracy and fee controls, Discourages development of private solutions through market competition

This regulation establishes non-discriminatory fees for a federally-operated ferry between Cedar Point and Christian Island, Ontario, but provides exemptions for 'Indians' (as defined in the Indian Act), government teachers on the island, and those conducting business with Indigenous residents. It sets different fare structures by age and vehicle size, plus charter rates.

The regulation codifies discriminatory treatment by exempting only persons of a specific racial/ethnic identity from fees, violating equal protection principles and distorting incentives. If the government wishes to subsidize ferry access for Indigenous communities, it should do so through transparent budgetary transfers rather than opaque fee exemptions that create two-tier citizenship. The regulation's identity-based carve-out entrenches inequality in access to public services.

This Order governs the operation of Department of National Defence laundry facilities, allowing them to provide laundry, dry cleaning, and pressing services to Canadian Forces personnel, their dependents, and certain civilian workers when civilian facilities are unavailable, capacity permits, and it doesn't interfere with primary public property laundering. It prescribes rates and establishes procedures for handling loss/damage claims.

This regulation codifies a non-essential government service that competes with private enterprise. The stated conditions (civilian facilities not available, capacity permitting) are inherently subjective and create potential for unfair competition. True market demand in any area would attract private laundries; government should not operate convenience services that private businesses can provide. Even if kept as internal policy, formalizing it as a regulation adds unnecessary state intrusion into a commercial activity better left to the marketplace. The claim handling procedures could be addressed through standard contract law or insurance without this separate regulatory framework.

These regulations govern the assignment of Crown debts in Canada, establishing procedures for notices of assignment, documentation requirements, and specific classes of Crown debts subject to assignment under the Financial Administration Act.

This regulation provides essential legal framework for debt assignment processes that protect both creditors and debtors in government financial transactions. Without it, there would be no standardized procedures for Crown debt assignments, creating legal uncertainty and potential financial chaos in government operations.

These regulations designate an Assistant Deputy Minister as the paying officer for crop advance payments and classify related rights as Crown debts under the Financial Administration Act.

This regulation provides essential financial infrastructure for farmers by ensuring crop advance payments are processed through a designated official and classified as Crown debts, which protects both farmers and lenders in the agricultural credit system. Without this framework, the advance payment system would lack the legal certainty needed for lenders to provide credit, potentially destabilizing farm financing and food production.