Browse regulations

Remission of customs duties on specific chloroprene sheets with nylon fabric lamination imported between 1998-2005 under certain weight and composition conditions.

This is a narrow, time-limited duty remission for a specific product category that expired in 2005. Such targeted trade interventions distort market signals, create compliance costs, and benefit specific importers while disadvantaging domestic producers and consumers through higher prices elsewhere. The market has had over 15 years to adjust without this intervention.

Three sections (1-3) of a regulation, all marked as repealed by SOR/2009-230, section 1. The original content and purpose of these sections are not visible in the provided text.

The regulation is already repealed and therefore obsolete. The repeal indicates the original provisions were either flawed, unnecessary, or superseded by better policies. Continuing to maintain repealed text in regulatory databases creates confusion and administrative burden without any benefit.

CEPA regulation mandating specific sulphur concentration limits (15-1000 mg/kg) for diesel fuel based on end-use, with extensive reporting, notification, and record-keeping requirements for producers and importers.

Imposes substantial compliance costs and bureaucratic burden on businesses, creating market distortions and barriers to entry. Arbitrary different standards for similar applications reflect central planning fallacies. Environmental goals could be better achieved through property rights protection and market-based mechanisms rather than command-and-control mandates that stifle innovation and economic freedom.

This order repeals Northwest Territories water regulations in Nunavut, transferring regulatory authority to Nunavut's own legislative framework following the creation of Nunavut in 1999.

Regulations from a jurisdiction that no longer exists should not apply. Nunavut now has its own legislative framework for water management, making these regulations obsolete and potentially conflicting with local governance structures.

This document appears to be a shell regulation with 554 sections, all of which are marked as '[Repealed, SOR/2010-20]'. There is no substantive content remaining; the entire regulation was repealed by Statutory Order in 2010.

This regulation has been fully repealed and serves no legal function. Keeping repealed statutes on the books creates confusion, adds unnecessary complexity to the regulatory code, and imposes administrative costs for maintenance and reference. The repeal was completed in 2010; continued formal presence provides zero benefits while distorting legal clarity.

This regulation document consists of two sections that have been repealed by SOR/2012-255. The text shows '[Repealed, SOR/2012-255, s. 2]' for both sections, indicating this regulation is no longer in force.

The regulation is already repealed and therefore irrelevant to current federal regulatory framework. It no longer has any legal effect or impact on Canadians.

Immigration and Refugee Protection Rules governing admissibility hearings, detention reviews, and procedural matters for immigration proceedings in Canada.

These rules provide essential procedural protections for vulnerable individuals facing deportation or detention. Without them, the immigration system would lack due process, transparency, and fairness - potentially leading to wrongful deportations and arbitrary detention.

Repealed provisions under SOR/2012-256, section 73, which removed certain regulations.

These rules have been formally repealed; retaining them would be obsolete and contrary to the goal of reducing regulatory burden.

This regulation establishes Canada's immigration control framework, requiring foreign nationals to obtain visas, permits, or electronic authorizations to enter, work, study, or settle. It defines family relationships, eligibility criteria, and application procedures, while including anti-fraud provisions and electronic processing mandates. The 'excessive demand' clause restricts immigration based on projected healthcare costs.

The regulation imposes enormous hidden costs: it violates property rights by denying peaceful individuals the right to move and contract, creates artificial labor scarcity that depresses economic growth, wastes resources on bureaucratic enforcement, and prevents mutually beneficial exchanges that would increase prosperity. The 'excessive demand' provision particularly harms by treating immigrants as net burdens rather than contributors who expand productive capacity and fund public services through taxes.

Temporary exemption for Royal Canadian Mounted Police and Canadian Forces from certain Radiocommunication Act provisions in a specific Ontario region during July 2002, allowing interference with radiocommunications for security, safety, international relations, or national defence purposes.

Canadians would be worse off if this regulation was deleted because it enables critical security and defence operations by law enforcement and military forces during a specific period, ensuring they can perform essential functions like preventing interference with their own communications or disrupting hostile signals without legal impediments.

This order exempts the RCMP and Canadian Forces from certain Radiocommunication Act provisions for a specific 12-day period in 2002, allowing them to interfere with radio communications in a defined area of Alberta for security, safety, or national defence purposes, with limitations on scope and duration.

This is a temporary, narrowly-scoped exemption for specific government agencies during a defined emergency period. It creates a legal loophole for government interference with communications that would otherwise be prohibited, setting a dangerous precedent for government overreach and undermining the principle of consistent application of law. The specific geographic and temporal limitations don't justify the fundamental issue of government agencies being above the law they enforce on citizens.

Regulation establishes comprehensive effluent standards for metal and diamond mines, prescribing maximum allowable concentrations for nine deleterious substances (arsenic, copper, cyanide, etc.), requiring pH between 6.0-9.5, banning acutely lethal effluent, and mandating frequent monitoring, detailed record-keeping, and quarterly reporting to protect water quality and fisheries.

The prescriptive, command-and-control approach imposes substantial compliance costs, stifles operational flexibility and innovation, and reduces Canadian mining competitiveness. The knowledge problem central to such detailed regulation means bureaucrats cannot efficiently determine optimal methods for each mine. Environmental protection can be achieved more efficiently through market mechanisms like strict liability for actual harm and tradable pollution permits, which harness price signals and local knowledge while avoiding the unseen economic damage of reduced investment, higher consumer costs, and regulatory capture.

Regulates chicken marketing in interprovincial and export trade through licensing, quotas, and supply controls. Establishes different licence types with fees, sets production limits, and enforces compliance with marketing schemes and levies. Includes specific conditions for market development and specialty chicken quotas.

Creates artificial scarcity through quota systems, raising chicken prices and reducing supply. Violates free market principles by restricting property rights and competition. Benefits licensed producers at consumers' expense while increasing regulatory burden and compliance costs without improving food security or affordability.

Defines 'retail association' for the Cooperative Credit Association Act as an association providing financial services to non-excluded persons under Ministerial approval.

Deleting this definition would create legal uncertainty, increasing compliance costs and risks of arbitrary enforcement, harming economic efficiency and liberty.

This regulation consists entirely of repealed sections (SOR/2015-131, s. 6). It has no legal effect and is merely historical record of provisions no longer in force.

Repealed regulations create legal clutter and confusion, imposing compliance costs through unnecessary archival and maintenance burden while potentially misleading citizens about active rules. Removing them entirely improves legal transparency and reduces administrative overhead.