Browse regulations

This regulation defines complex rules for determining when investment plans and financial institutions have a permanent establishment in Canadian provinces for Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) purposes. It sets detailed criteria, exceptions, and thresholds for entities including mutual funds, pension plans, trusts, and partnerships, dictating when they must pay provincial HST based on their activities and unit holder residence.

This regulation imposes substantial compliance costs and administrative burdens on financial institutions, discouraging investment and innovation. The complex rules and numerous exceptions create barriers to entry, favoring large established firms over smaller competitors, while adding hidden costs that reduce returns to savers and investors. By making cross-province financial services more complicated, it contributes to capital flight and undermines Canada's competitiveness. The underlying tax on these entities should be repealed, not administered through increasingly intricate regulations that distort economic decisions.

This regulation appears to be a set of repealed provisions, with all sections (1-12) having been repealed by SOR/2010-117, s. 59. The original purpose and mechanisms are not provided in the current text.

All provisions have already been repealed (SOR/2010-117, s. 59), making this regulation obsolete. Repealed regulations serve no purpose and create unnecessary regulatory clutter, potentially confusing compliance efforts.

This Order remits anti-dumping duties on low-osmolality iodinated contrast media imported from the US, establishing complex formulas to calculate allowable remission amounts based on reference values and resale prices, with conditions including documentation and audit requirements, and annual CPI indexing.

Perpetuates protectionist duties that increase medical costs, reduce competition, and impose administrative burdens without eliminating the underlying trade barrier harming Canadian healthcare affordability.

Establishes public port designations, safety regulations, and operational procedures for Canadian ports including vessel management, dangerous goods handling, and port authority powers.

Creates unnecessary bureaucratic barriers to maritime commerce and imposes costly compliance requirements on shipping operations. The detailed operational restrictions and authorization requirements distort market efficiency and increase costs for Canadian exporters and importers without providing commensurate safety benefits that could be achieved through private contractual arrangements.

Establishes an administrative monetary penalty (AMP) system for violations of the Pest Control Products Act and its associated regulations. Defines violation categories (minor, serious, very serious), prescribes penalty amounts ($500-$1,300 for individuals, $1,300-$10,000+ for businesses), includes gravity adjustments based on history, intent, and harm, and sets procedures for service, payment, compliance agreements, and review.

This regulation imposes substantial compliance costs and financial penalties, creating a subjective enforcement framework where regulators determine 'intent,' 'negligence,' and 'harm' with wide discretion, leading to arbitrary penalties. The penalty structure can financially devastate small operators, incentivizing regulatory compliance over productive activity. The 'compliance agreement' system allows wealth to buy down penalties, undermining equal justice. By lowering the burden of proof relative to criminal law, it expands government's punitive reach into routine business operations, chilling innovation and contributing to Canada's regulatory burden that drives talent and investment away. The legitimate goal of preventing pesticide misuse can be achieved through existing tort and criminal law mechanisms without this overbearing administrative regime.

Excludes uranium mining employment from federal labour and health standards, instead applying Saskatchewan provincial regulations for safety, electrical, boiler, elevator, and radiation standards with specific modifications.

Creates regulatory patchwork that undermines worker protections - federal employees in uranium sector lose core labour rights while provincial standards may be weaker. The exclusion fragments Canada's unified labour framework and creates jurisdictional confusion about which standards apply.

Regulation mandates detailed disclosure requirements for consumer credit agreements, including standardized APR calculations, specific timing and formatting rules (font sizes, presentation), and periodic statements under the Trust and Loan Companies Act.

Imposes substantial compliance costs that reduce competition, increase borrowing costs, and stifle innovation. Mandates one-size-fits-all disclosure format treating consumers as incapable of understanding contracts without government prescription. The complex APR formula encourages regulatory gaming rather than genuine clarity and diverts resources from productive lending to paperwork compliance.

Mandates detailed cost of borrowing disclosure (APR calculations, specific information, formatting, and timing) for foreign companies extending credit to Canadian consumers, excluding business and certain student loans.

Increases borrowing costs and reduces competition by raising compliance barriers for foreign lenders. Market mechanisms—reputation, contract law, and competition—already incentivize transparent disclosure without rigid government mandates. The regulation’s technical prescriptions (formulas, font sizes, disclosure schedules) impose knowledge problems, stifle innovation in how information is presented, and protect domestic institutions from foreign competition. Unseen costs include higher interest rates, reduced credit availability, and suppressed financial product innovation that could better serve consumers.

Regulation requires standardized APR disclosure and information boxes for credit agreements, ensuring borrowers understand costs and terms before entering into loans or credit card agreements.

Without this regulation, borrowers would lack standardized cost disclosure, making it difficult to compare credit products and potentially leading to predatory lending practices. The APR calculation requirements ensure transparency in borrowing costs.

This regulation imposes levies and additional charges on broiler hatching eggs traded interprovincially or for export, with rates varying by province. It establishes quota-based penalties for exceeding allocated amounts and creates a collection system through provincial Commodity Boards. Most definitions and key sections have already been repealed, and the levy provisions expire on June 23, 2026.

This regulation enforces interprovincial trade barriers through quota systems and differential provincial levies, artificially constraining supply and raising costs. It represents the exact type of internal trade restriction the user identified as more restrictive than many international barriers. The complex administration creates compliance burdens while doing nothing to enhance prosperity or liberty. With most provisions already repealed and a sunset clause in 2026, the government itself recognizes its obsolescence.

Investment governance rules for the Public Sector Pension Investment Board, including definitions, investment concentration limits (10% single counterparty), prohibition on >30% voting control of corporations (with exceptions), related-party transaction restrictions, required investment policies, record-keeping, and executive compensation disclosure.

Canadians would be worse off without this regulation because it safeguards public sector pension funds from mismanagement, conflicts of interest, and excessive risk-taking by a government entity managing workers' retirement savings. The rules achieve prudent fiduciary management through enforceable concentration limits, arm's-length transaction requirements, transparency, and governance standards that would be difficult to maintain through market mechanisms alone given the public nature of the mandate and lack of market discipline on a government entity.

Exempts Canadian Coast Guard ships from Canada Shipping Act provisions on crew certification, accommodation, international labor conventions, port departure defaults, and dangerous goods regulations for aviation fuel.

Deleting this exemption would force Coast Guard vessels to comply with rigid commercial shipping rules, hampering emergency response and specialized operations. The Coast Guard can maintain safety through internal standards; this flexibility is essential for effective maritime security, search and rescue, and fisheries protection.

This regulation document consists entirely of repealed sections (all 1-26 marked as repealed by SOR/2007-126, s. 19). No substantive provisions remain. The structure suggests it was once a comprehensive regulatory framework with 3 parts and multiple divisions, but all content has been removed through repeal.

The regulation is already fully repealed and therefore obsolete. Maintaining repealed regulations on the books creates legal uncertainty, wastes regulatory resources on dead letters, and burdens the legal system with navigating historical amendments. The repeal itself indicates the regulation was deemed unnecessary or defective, and retaining it serves no legitimate purpose while increasing compliance and interpretive costs.

This regulation consists of two sections (1 and 2) that have been repealed by SOR/2007-303, section 44, and are no longer in force.

The regulation is already repealed and therefore obsolete. It no longer imposes any costs or restrictions on Canadians.

The regulation consists of sections 1-3, all of which have been repealed by SOR/2013-19, section 6. The original content is not visible in the provided document.

This regulation is already repealed and therefore obsolete. It no longer has any legal force or effect, so retaining it as active would be nonsensical. The repeal indicates the original regulation was deemed unnecessary or problematic by the governing authority.