Browse regulations

This is the Radiation Devices Regulations under Canada's Nuclear Safety and Control Act. It governs licensing, certification, and safety requirements for radiation devices and nuclear substances. Key mechanisms include: licensing requirements for activities with radioactive materials; certification of radiation device models and operators; exemptions for low-risk items (smoke detectors, safety signs, check sources under specific activity limits); operational safety protocols including leak testing, calibration requirements, accident procedures, and signage; and due process provisions for certification decisions.

Radiation devices and nuclear substances pose catastrophic, irreversible risks to public health and the environment through radiation exposure and contamination. These are classic externalities that markets cannot price—individuals cannot assess radiation risks, and contamination crosses property boundaries. The regulation is risk-based (with thoughtful exemption thresholds for trivial quantities), mandates operator competency, ensures device safety through certification, and provides procedural due process. Deleting it would allow unqualified operators, uncertified devices, and inadequate safety protocols, creating unacceptable risks of radiation accidents that harm innocent bystanders and contaminate environments permanently. The compliance costs are proportionate to the magnitude of potential harm.

Comprehensive regulatory framework governing uranium mining and milling operations in Canada, including licensing requirements, environmental protection programs, worker health and safety protocols, radiation protection measures, waste management systems, emergency response planning, and detailed operational standards.

Uranium mining involves radioactive materials that pose catastrophic, irreversible risks to public health and the environment, including long-term contamination that can persist for millennia. The extreme information asymmetry, potential for uncompensated third-party harm, and long-tail risks create a market failure that cannot be addressed through tort law or insurance alone. These regulations are proportionate to the unique dangers and protect Canadians from radiation exposure and environmental degradation that the free market would fail to prevent.

Regulates construction, operation, and servicing of Class II nuclear facilities and equipment (e.g., medical radiation devices, irradiators, particle accelerators) through licensing, equipment certification, safety officer requirements, and technical safety standards.

Canadians would be worse off because deletion would eliminate critical safeguards against radiation hazards, posing severe health and environmental risks. Radiation harms are catastrophic and affect non-consenting persons; market mechanisms alone cannot prevent these externalities due to asymmetric information. The regulation's targeted, risk-based approach is the least restrictive way to ensure safety, and its removal would cause far greater harm than compliance costs.

Regulation establishes licensing requirements for Class I nuclear facilities, including detailed application contents for site preparation, construction, operation, decommissioning, and abandonment; certification procedures for personnel; and record-keeping obligations. It ensures safety, security, and environmental protection throughout a nuclear facility's lifecycle under a 24-month regulatory review timeline.

Deletion would eliminate essential safeguards against catastrophic radiation releases that exceed any private liability capacity. Nuclear accidents cause irreversible, cross-border harm to health, property, and environment that market forces alone cannot prevent due to extreme externality costs and information asymmetries. This licensing framework protects Canadians' liberty and prosperity by ensuring only competent operators with rigorous safety planning can proceed.

This regulation establishes comprehensive radiation protection standards for nuclear energy workers in Canada, setting dose limits, monitoring requirements, and safety protocols for handling nuclear substances. It defines exposure limits for effective dose, equivalent dose to organs, and special provisions for pregnant workers and emergency situations.

This regulation creates unnecessary regulatory burden on nuclear industry operations, imposing costly monitoring requirements and compliance costs that drive up energy prices. The extensive documentation and reporting requirements divert resources from productive investment and innovation. Private sector liability and insurance markets would provide more efficient radiation safety standards without government micromanagement.

Comprehensive nuclear safety regulations covering licensing, worker safety, environmental protection, nuclear non-proliferation safeguards, and incident reporting for nuclear substances, facilities, and equipment in Canada.

Creates massive regulatory burden that stifles nuclear energy development, increases costs, and drives brain drain to less regulated countries while failing to prevent determined actors from obtaining nuclear materials.

This regulation establishes the administrative monetary penalty (AMP) system for violations under the Health of Animals Act, Plant Protection Act, and Safe Food for Canadians Act. It sets fine amounts ($500-$10,000) based on violation severity (minor/serious/very serious) and whether committed by individuals or businesses. It includes criteria for calculating total gravity values based on history, intent, and harm, provisions for compliance agreements (reducing penalties by 50% for corrective action), detailed service procedures, and review processes by the Minister or Tribunal.

This AMP system provides a necessary, proportional enforcement mechanism for legitimate public health and safety regulations in agriculture and food. The tiered penalties and compliance incentives encourage remediation rather than pure punishment. Removing it would undermine enforcement of critical standards protecting Canada's food supply, animal health, and plant biosecurity, creating uncertainty for businesses and potentially compromising agricultural safety.

Establishes the DNA Data Bank Advisory Committee to advise the RCMP Commissioner on the operation of the national DNA data bank, composed of appointed members from police, legal, scientific, academic communities, and the Privacy Commissioner's office, with annual reporting requirements.

Creates an unnecessary bureaucratic layer that legitimizes and perpetuates the state's collection and use of citizens' DNA data. Advisory committees institutionalize surveillance and fail to prevent expansion of the DNA data bank despite well-documented privacy risks, mission creep, and potential for misuse. The expertise claimed could be obtained through ad hoc consultations without creating a permanent government apparatus that normalizes genetic profiling. Annual reporting creates administrative burden for no measurable public benefit, and political appointments risk capture by law enforcement interests over civil liberties.

These regulations prescribe detailed procedural requirements for the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation (CDIC) when issuing notices related to vesting orders and receivership orders under the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation Act. They specify required notice content (dates, explanations, compensation basis, response instructions) and mandatory delivery methods (in-person, prepaid mail, messenger, fax/electronic) to various parties including shareholders, assignees, and federal member institutions.

This regulation imposes rigid, bureaucratic procedural requirements on CDIC's resolution processes, increasing administrative costs and reducing operational flexibility during time-sensitive bank failures. The mandated delivery methods and specific content requirements create unnecessary red tape that could delay resolution and increase costs to the financial system, while achieving no clear benefit over allowing CDIC discretion in communication methods. These formalities exemplify regulatory overreach into what should be a flexible, market-driven resolution process where efficiency and speed are paramount to preserving value and maintaining financial stability.

These Regulations establish transitional rules for pension benefits when a public service employee continues working for an entity ('withdrawing employer') that has been removed from the Public Service Superannuation Act. They clarify that service with the withdrawing employer counts as pensionable service, set death benefit entitlements, child allowance eligibility, and timing rules for benefit calculations.

This regulation extends public pension liabilities beyond the public sector, creating complex administrative burdens and unfunded obligations that distort labor markets. It forces the public pension system to cover private-sector employment, violating the principle that pension risks should be borne by the employer and employee directly involved. The regulatory complexity imposes compliance costs on withdrawing employers while creating moral hazard by allowing public service pension benefits to follow workers into private entities.

Regulation sets fees for Department of Public Works employees working on expropriation cases: twice the employee's hourly rate (prorated from annual salary based on 220 work days) plus 20% benefits, with interest on overdue amounts.

The 'twice hourly rate' multiplier is an arbitrary bureaucratic construct lacking economic rationale; it creates perverse incentives for overstaffing and overcharging, distorts cost-benefit analysis of expropriation decisions, and fails the Misesian test of serving consumer sovereignty. Genuine cost recovery should use transparent actual costs without artificial markups, or better yet, let market-determined pricing emerge through competitive procurement.

This appears to be a set of repealed regulations from SOR/2010-187, section 1, with no active provisions remaining.

Regulations are already repealed and obsolete, creating no value while maintaining unnecessary administrative overhead.

Military Police Code of Conduct regulating the behaviour of military police officers under the National Defence Act, establishing standards for lawful conduct, use of force, reporting requirements, and disciplinary procedures.

Military police require specific conduct standards to maintain public trust and operational effectiveness. Without these regulations, there would be no clear framework to prevent abuse of power, ensure accountability, or maintain professional standards in military law enforcement operations. The Code provides essential oversight mechanisms that protect both military personnel and civilians from potential misconduct while enabling effective security operations.

Marine pilotage licensing and certification regulations establishing medical fitness requirements, sea service experience, and examination standards for pilots operating in Canadian compulsory pilotage areas, including the Atlantic region with specific vessel and area exemptions.

Ensures maritime safety through qualified pilots who must meet medical fitness standards, demonstrate local navigational knowledge, and maintain current experience, preventing accidents that could cause environmental disasters, loss of life, and economic damage to Canada's shipping industry.

This regulation updates references to the Public Service Labour Relations Act in other federal regulations to point to the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act, which replaced the former act. It applies to all references except those explicitly exempted in subsection (1).

Canadians would be worse off if this regulation was deleted because it would create legal uncertainty and inconsistency across federal regulations. Without this reference update, courts and employers would have to interpret outdated references to a defunct act, potentially leading to disputes about which legal framework applies to federal public sector labour relations. This creates administrative chaos and legal costs that would burden both taxpayers and public servants.