Browse regulations

Regulations 1-7 were previously repealed by SOR/2017-84, s. 1, indicating they were removed from the federal regulatory framework in 2017.

These regulations have already been repealed and are no longer in effect, representing obsolete regulatory burden that should remain deleted to maintain regulatory efficiency and avoid unnecessary compliance costs.

The regulation consists of four sections, all of which are explicitly repealed by SOR/2017-84. No active provisions remain.

The regulation is already entirely repealed and has no current legal effect. Retaining it in the statute books creates confusion and maintenance burden with zero benefit.

Regulations 1-3 were repealed in 2017 (SOR/2017-84, s. 1) and are no longer in effect.

Already repealed and obsolete. No current regulatory burden exists.

These regulations have already been repealed and are no longer in effect.

Already repealed in 2017, making them obsolete and redundant. No longer impose any regulatory burden.

These regulations (sections 1-7) have been repealed by SOR/2017-84 and are no longer in force.

Already repealed - these regulations are obsolete. Repeal indicates they were either flawed, unnecessary, or superseded by better alternatives.

This regulation appears to be a repealed set of rules, with all provisions removed in 2017 under SOR/2017-84, section 1.

The regulation has already been repealed and is obsolete. Keeping repealed regulations serves no purpose and creates unnecessary legal clutter that can confuse compliance efforts and obscure current regulatory frameworks.

Repealed regulations from SOR/2017-84, section 1

These regulations were already repealed in 2017 and are therefore obsolete. Repealed regulations represent regulatory dead weight that should be removed from the books to reduce complexity and prevent confusion about current requirements.

These sections (1-4) were repealed by SOR/2017-84, section 1, indicating they are no longer in force and have been removed from the regulatory framework.

Regulations are already repealed and obsolete, representing unnecessary regulatory burden that has been properly eliminated from the legal framework.

The document shows that sections 1-8 of the regulation have been repealed by SOR/2017-84, section 1, and are no longer in force.

Sections are already repealed, making them obsolete and legally void; keeping them would cause confusion and serve no purpose. Their repeal indicates they were flawed or unnecessary, aligning with the need to remove regulatory burdens.

These regulations have already been repealed by SOR/2017-135, s. 1. They were originally part of the Dairy Products Regulations but are no longer in force.

Already repealed and obsolete. No current regulatory burden exists, but maintaining repealed provisions creates confusion and unnecessary complexity in the regulatory code.

A regulation consisting of 5 sections, all of which have been repealed by SOR/2017-84. No substantive current provisions remain.

Regulation is obsolete and legally ineffective. All sections have been repealed, making it irrelevant to current policy. Keeping repealed statutes creates legal clutter and confusion.

Entire regulation consists of six sections, all of which have been repealed by SOR/2017-84, s. 1. No active provisions remain.

Already repealed and therefore legally irrelevant. The regulation no longer exists in the statute books and imposes no costs, burdens, or restrictions on Canadians.

This regulation establishes a fee structure for the examination and processing of applications related to pest control products, including registration fees, data requirements, and annual charges based on sales revenue.

The regulatory framework creates significant barriers to entry for new pest control products, increases costs for farmers and consumers, and centralizes decision-making power with government officials who may not have the local knowledge to make optimal choices about pest management. The complex fee structure and data requirements favor large corporations over smaller innovators, reducing competition and slowing the development of potentially safer or more effective pest control solutions.

This order defines 'non-restricted firearm' and provides a temporary amnesty period (May 17-Dec 31, 2017) for individuals with expired or expiring firearm licences to regularize their status through licensing, deactivation, export, surrender, sale, or possession before taking action.

Creates a temporary, arbitrary amnesty period that treats law-abiding citizens as criminals for paperwork failures, discourages proper licensing compliance, and establishes precedent for selective enforcement rather than addressing the underlying licensing system's complexity and burden.

Pension benefits increase for Royal Canadian Mounted Police widows and beneficiaries under Part IV of the RCMP Pension Continuation Act, with specific percentage increases for 2017-2019 plan years and deemed contribution increases for residual amounts based on widow's death year.

These pension adjustments ensure financial security for RCMP widows and beneficiaries, maintaining their purchasing power against inflation and honoring commitments to those who sacrificed alongside public servants.