Browse regulations

This regulation establishes a levy system for Quebec beef cattle producers engaged in interprovincial and export trade. It creates a mandatory fee structure administered by the Fédération des producteurs de bovins du Québec, with collection mechanisms through either direct payment by producers or deduction by buyers.

This regulation creates a mandatory fee that distorts market signals and reduces producer income without providing clear benefits. The levy system imposes additional costs on beef cattle production, reducing competitiveness and limiting supply. It represents regulatory overhead that harms Canadian producers while potentially creating market distortions through price manipulation.

This appears to be a list of regulations numbered 1-34, all of which have been repealed by SOR/2014-37, section 23. The regulations are no longer in force and have no current legal effect.

These regulations have already been repealed and are obsolete. They serve no current purpose and maintaining them in any regulatory framework would be unnecessary bureaucratic overhead.

Requires trust and loan companies to disclose interest rates and calculation methods to deposit account customers at account opening, upon changes, and in advertisements. Disclosure must include annual rate, payment frequency, balance effects, and other circumstances affecting rates.

Market competition already provides strong incentives for financial institutions to clearly disclose terms to attract and retain customers. The regulation imposes uniform compliance costs that are passed to consumers, reduces flexibility in information presentation, and contributes to a regulatory burden that diminishes Canada's financial sector competitiveness. Consumers are capable of requesting information and comparing offers; mandatory disclosure creates a false sense of security while undermining personal responsibility and freedom of contract.

This regulation governs credit notes and debit notes for GST/HST purposes, specifying required information including supplier details, recipient information, dates, and tax adjustment calculations. It provides detailed rules for documenting tax adjustments on invoices when prices or taxes change after supply.

Canadians would be worse off if this regulation was deleted because it ensures proper tax documentation and prevents fraud. The credit/debit note requirements provide transparency for both businesses and tax authorities, making it harder to evade GST/HST obligations. Without these standardized documentation rules, businesses could more easily underreport taxes owed, leading to revenue losses that would either increase tax rates for everyone or reduce public services.

This GST/HST regulation prescribes printed publications (books, newspapers, periodicals, magazines) and accompanying audio recordings as taxable property for GST/HST purposes. It requires suppliers to display their registration number or evidence of registration application on the publication, its packaging, or accompanying documents when submitting to Canada Post or customs officials.

The regulation imposes unnecessary administrative burdens on publishers without clear necessity. Tax compliance can be achieved through less intrusive means such as filing requirements and audit powers. The unseen costs include discouraging publication, raising consumer prices through compliance costs, and adding to the regulatory burden that harms Canada's competitiveness and freedom.

This regulation defines 'general sales tax rate' and 'specified tax rate' for Canada's provinces and prescribes which provincial taxes, duties, and fees are recognized under section 154 of the Excise Tax Act. It extensively lists land transfer taxes, provincial sales taxes, and various municipal/provincial fees that meet specific criteria (percentage-based, payable by recipient, not exceeding specified rate). The document is heavily amended with numerous repealed subsections and retroactive effective dates.

This technical regulation is primarily bookkeeping that entrenchs federal oversight of provincial tax systems. The 'specified tax rate' concept (12% or provincial rate + 4%) imposes an artificial ceiling that may constrain provincial tax autonomy. The regulation achieves coordination that could be handled more simply through mutual agreement or eliminated entirely if federal excise tax provisions were repealed. The extensive repealed provisions and retroactive dates demonstrate regulatory accretion without clear necessity. The compliance burden on provinces to ensure their tax structures fit within these federal definitions creates distortion without addressing any genuine market failure. If deleted, provinces would retain full authority over their tax structures and federal administration would need to adapt minimally.

This regulation governs temporary importation rules for goods exempt from GST/HST, covering precious metals, art on consignment, warranty repairs, crude oil refining, foreign conveyances, railway equipment, and qualifying vehicles, with specific documentation and time requirements.

The regulation creates complex administrative burdens that increase costs for businesses and consumers while providing limited economic benefit. The temporary importation rules distort market signals and create opportunities for tax avoidance, while the administrative compliance costs outweigh the revenue protection benefits.

Regulations establishing a list of diseases that must be reported under the Health of Animals Act to enable disease surveillance and control in Canada's agricultural sector.

Canadians would be worse off if this regulation was deleted because it enables early detection and control of animal diseases that could devastate livestock industries, threaten food security, and potentially spread to humans. The reporting framework creates a systematic surveillance system that prevents costly outbreaks and protects both agricultural productivity and public health.

Defines 'area of transmission' for terrestrial broadcast stations (TV, FM, AM) and distinguishes 'local' versus 'distant' signals for copyright royalty purposes under subsection 31(2) of the Copyright Act. Includes detailed technical methods for calculating coverage contours (HAAT, field strength, propagation curves).

Provides essential objective standards for determining local signal status, ensuring predictable royalty distribution and protecting local broadcaster compensation. Deletion would cause legal uncertainty, undermine the copyright scheme, and likely reduce investment in local programming.

This regulation has been repealed in its entirety as of 2014 through legislative action (2014, c. 13, art. 53). The document contains only repealed provisions with no remaining legal force or effect.

The regulation is already repealed and legally obsolete. Maintaining references to repealed laws creates regulatory clutter and confusion about current legal requirements. There is no public benefit from preserving dead letter statutes.

Cannot determine purpose - all sections shown as repealed with no substantive content available. The document appears to be a shell or placeholder indicating prior regulation that was entirely repealed by SOR/2014-293.

Already repealed and legally null. No remaining legal effect. Even if it had content, the fact of total repeal suggests the regulation was flawed or obsolete. Dead law imposes no costs but also provides no benefits; keeping it on books creates legal confusion and compliance burden if ever referenced.

Regulations 2-26 were repealed by SOR/2014-293, s. 11, making them obsolete with no current legal effect or regulatory function.

These regulations have already been repealed and serve no current purpose. Maintaining obsolete regulations creates unnecessary legal complexity and regulatory burden without any benefit to Canadians.

Document indicates sections 1 and 2 were repealed by SOR/2014-293, s.11; original substantive content not provided.

Already repealed, proving it was flawed or unnecessary; retaining such text adds no legal value and creates confusion.

Document consists of multiple sections (1-8) all marked as repealed by SOR/2014-293, s. 11. No substantive regulation remains in force.

Already repealed; no current regulatory burden. Original regulation was superfluous if it could be entirely removed without consequence, suggesting it was either unnecessary or properly superseded by better mechanisms.

A regulation with 98 sections, all of which have been repealed by SOR/2014-281, s. 58. No substantive provisions are currently in force.

The regulation is already repealed and has no legal effect. Maintaining references to it in the regulatory corpus serves no purpose and creates confusion.