Sections 1-9 of a federal regulation, all marked as repealed in 1998 (c. 10, s. 201). The document contains no current regulatory text.
Already repealed and legally void. No longer part of Canada's regulatory framework; reviewing it serves no purpose for current deregulation efforts.
This regulation has been completely repealed since 1998 and contains no active provisions, making it entirely obsolete with no current legal effect.
Completely repealed since 1998, this regulation serves no purpose and creates unnecessary legal complexity by remaining in the code. Its continued existence wastes government resources and legal professionals' time while providing zero benefit to Canadians.
These are repealed regulations that were previously in force but have been formally removed from the regulatory framework in 1998 and 2013. They are no longer active or enforceable.
Regulations are already repealed and obsolete. Keeping them in any form would create confusion and administrative burden without any benefit to Canadians.
Regulation consisting of sections 1-5, all fully repealed by SOR/2012-253, section 17. No longer in force.
Already repealed and obsolete. No longer has any legal effect or regulatory burden on Canadians.
These regulations were repealed by various statutory orders (SOR/2013-19, SOR/89-281, SOR/93-390, SOR/93-520, SOR/2007-131) between 1989 and 2013, indicating they are no longer in force and have been formally removed from the regulatory framework.
These regulations are already repealed and obsolete, having been formally removed from the regulatory framework between 1989 and 2013. They serve no current purpose and should remain deleted to eliminate any residual regulatory burden.
A regulation document consisting entirely of listings of repealed or revoked sections, indicating the regulation itself has been largely dismantled through previous amendments (SOR/2013-61, SOR/92-18).
Already repealed and legally dormant; maintaining it on the books creates unnecessary compliance confusion and administrative burden even if unenforced. Dead letter regulations should be formally removed to reduce regulatory clutter and legal uncertainty.
Regulation consisting of sections 1-7, all marked as repealed by SOR/2013-173. No current regulatory content in force.
Already repealed (obsolete). No longer has legal effect or creates any regulatory burden.
Regulations governing application, eligibility, and payment of allowances to veterans, survivors, and spouses under the War Veterans Allowance Act, including procedures, required documentation, definitions (blindness, residence), income thresholds, and review processes.
Deletion would harm veterans who sacrificed for Canada; this program provides essential targeted support and the regulation administers it efficiently with minimal market interference.
The regulation provides a mechanism for RCMP officers to reduce their pension to provide survivor benefits to their spouse, detailing calculation formulas based on actuarial assumptions, election procedures, documentation, and implementation.
Government-mandated pensions distort labor decisions, impose unfunded liabilities on taxpayers, restrict individual retirement freedom, and contribute to the tax and regulatory burden that drives brain drain and reduces Canada's competitiveness.
This regulation restricts authorized foreign banks and trust/loan companies from engaging in most insurance activities, permitting only specific 'authorized types' (credit-related, mortgage, travel, etc.) and imposing strict separation requirements between banking and insurance operations including promotion, information sharing, and physical premises.
This regulation imposes artificial market barriers that increase costs for consumers, stifle innovation and competition, and restrict consumer choice by preventing integrated financial services. The blanket prohibitions assume conflicts of interest cannot be managed through targeted rules (disclosure, suitability standards), resulting in higher prices, reduced financial sector competitiveness, and fewer convenient options for Canadians.
Regulation designates a list of 56 countries eligible for tariff item 9810.00.00 under the Customs Tariff, providing them with preferential tariff treatment (likely duty-free or reduced rates) for certain goods exported to Canada. It is a simple list with no other mechanisms or conditions.
Preferential tariff treatment distorts trade by picking winners and losers arbitrarily based on nationality rather than merit. It creates hidden costs: Canadian consumers and businesses face higher prices for goods from non-listed countries, domestic producers face unfair competition from subsidized imports, and bureaucrats must maintain complex eligibility lists. True free trade means equal treatment for all nations; this regulation violates that principle and serves political, not economic, objectives. Simpler, fairer policy: eliminate tariffs on all goods from all countries.
Regulations governing the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board's investment activities, including restrictions on investment concentration (10% limit in any single entity, 30% voting rights cap), related-party transaction rules requiring market terms, trustholding requirements, and mandatory annual reporting on governance and compensation.
Canadians would be worse off if deleted because these regulations are essential fiduciary safeguards for a mandatory public pension fund. They prevent self-dealing, ensure prudent diversification, enforce arm's-length market pricing, and require transparency—all critical to protect contributors' retirement security from mismanagement and conflicts of interest in a system where participation is compulsory. The rules address principal-agent problems and maintain market discipline that would be difficult to replicate otherwise.
This regulation was repealed in 2012 and no longer has any legal effect or regulatory force.
The regulation was already repealed in 2012, making it obsolete and no longer serving any regulatory purpose. Repealed regulations should be removed from active consideration as they cannot provide any benefit to Canadians.
This regulation document contains only repealed sections (1-15) from previous regulations, indicating it is either a title or consolidated version of revoked regulations with no current legal effect.
The regulation is already repealed, making it legally irrelevant. Repeal results from SOR/2012-262 and SOR/2004-273, demonstrating prior recognition of its obsolescence or undesirability. Maintaining repealed regulations in the corpus creates legal confusion and administrative burden, violating principles of legal clarity and efficient governance.
Regulation mandates specific storage, display, and transportation security measures for businesses handling firearms. It imposes requirements like locked cabinets, electronic alarms, opaque containers, and display restrictions, with escalating rules for restricted/prohibited firearms. Businesses may seek approval for alternative security measures from chief firearms officers.
This regulation imposes costly, prescriptive security mandates that raise barriers to entry, reduce competition, and increase consumer prices. It replaces market-driven security decisions (tort liability, insurance) with bureaucratic one-size-fits-all requirements, creating regulatory capture opportunities and unintended reductions in supply.