Browse regulations

Banking regulations governing insurance activities, including definitions of authorized insurance types, permitted banking insurance operations, promotion restrictions, and information sharing prohibitions

Canadians would be worse off if deleted because these regulations prevent banks from using their privileged position to unfairly promote insurance products, protect customer privacy by restricting information sharing with insurers, and ensure insurance remains separate from core banking services where conflicts of interest could harm consumers

Regulates bank lending to affiliated persons under Bank Act, defining categories of affiliation (officers, significant shareholders, major borrowers, suppliers, etc.) and establishing lending limits and disclosure requirements to prevent conflicts of interest and protect bank capital.

Canadians would be worse off if this regulation was deleted because it protects depositors and the financial system from conflicts of interest where bank insiders could exploit their positions to obtain preferential loans, potentially endangering bank stability and taxpayer-backed deposit insurance.

Regulates related party transactions for banks, allowing certain transactions with foreign bank subsidiaries and other related parties while imposing restrictions on deposit amounts and transaction types to prevent conflicts of interest and protect financial stability.

This regulation creates artificial barriers to market efficiency by restricting voluntary transactions between willing parties. It assumes banks cannot manage their own risk and relationships, leading to higher costs, reduced competition, and less innovative financial products. The complex restrictions distort market signals and prevent banks from optimizing their operations, ultimately harming consumers through reduced services and higher fees.

Administrative court forms for parole ineligibility review applications under Criminal Code section 745, providing standardized procedures for individuals to apply for reduced parole ineligibility periods

These procedural forms ensure due process and accessible justice with negligible compliance costs, protecting individual rights without distorting economic incentives or markets

This regulation prescribes specific agricultural and fishing equipment as eligible property for favorable tax treatment under the Excise Tax Act, listing detailed technical specifications for tractors, harvesting equipment, tillage tools, seeders, haying equipment, grain handling machinery, milking systems, pesticides, and other farm inputs. It defines precise thresholds (power ratings, operational widths, capacities) that equipment must meet to qualify.

This regulation distorts market allocation by granting selective tax benefits to specific equipment configurations, creating arbitrary thresholds that incentivize suboptimal capital purchases to qualify for tax breaks rather than based on economic merit. It generates rent-seeking lobbying to modify specifications, increases tax code complexity, and violates neutral taxation principles. The unseen costs include misallocation of agricultural capital, administrative burdens for farmers and tax authorities, and unfair competitive advantages for larger operations able to meet size thresholds.

Regulations governing temporary importation of goods, vessels, and vehicles, establishing formulas to determine value for duty based on duration of stay and remaining duties payable, with specific provisions for various categories including software, railway equipment, and qualifying vehicles.

These regulations provide essential clarity for temporary importation processes, preventing arbitrary customs assessments and ensuring predictable costs for businesses. Without them, importers would face uncertainty about duty calculations, potentially deterring legitimate temporary imports that benefit the Canadian economy through tourism, business travel, and temporary equipment use.

Regulation establishes government-controlled parking fees at Minister-operated airports with specific rates for five locations and provides exemptions for Senators and MPs. It mandates payment timing based on metered vs. non-metered spaces.

Creates government monopoly pricing with political exemptions for Senators/MPs, stifling private competition that could offer better prices and service. Fixed price controls prevent market allocation of parking resources and grant special privileges to political elites.

Sets fees for aircraft landing, terminal use, parking, and emergency services at Canadian airports, with charges based on aircraft weight, seating capacity, and flight type (domestic/international).

Creates arbitrary pricing distortions that increase air travel costs, reduces competition by making smaller airports less viable, and imposes bureaucratic overhead without clear market-based pricing mechanisms.

Government Airport Concession Operations Regulations establish permit systems, vehicle classification, and operational rules for commercial transportation services at federally managed airports, including taxicabs, limousines, and courtesy vehicles.

Creates artificial scarcity and monopoly rents through permit requirements, increases costs for travelers, restricts competition that would naturally emerge at airports, and imposes unnecessary bureaucratic overhead that benefits incumbent operators at the expense of consumers.

Regulation establishes height and use restrictions within a 4km radius of Cape Dorset Airport to protect aviation safety. It prohibits buildings, structures, natural growth, and certain land uses that would penetrate defined imaginary surfaces (approach, outer, strip, transitional) or attract hazardous wildlife. The boundaries are precisely defined by geometric coordinates and elevations in the attached schedule.

Canadians would be worse off because deletion would create an unacceptable risk of aircraft accidents, potentially causing loss of life, property damage, and disruption of vital air transport to the remote community. The regulation achieves its safety objective through enforceable, objective standards that prevent irreversible harm before it occurs; relying on liability lawsuits would be inadequate because victims (passengers, ground persons) are not in direct contractual relationships with violators and accidents cannot be undone.

This regulation establishes airport zoning for Clyde River Airport, Nunavut, defining imaginary protected surfaces (approach, outer, strip, transitional) around the airport. It prohibits buildings, structures, objects, or natural growth from penetrating these surfaces, bans uses that attract wildlife (especially birds) or cause signal interference, and applies to all lands within a 4,000m radius.

Aviation safety is a legitimate public good that cannot rely on market mechanisms due to insurmountable transaction costs and diffuse risks affecting thousands of non-consenting parties. The regulation prevents catastrophic harm from aircraft collisions and bird strikes. The precise technical boundaries minimize restrictions while achieving essential safety outcomes that property owners cannot negotiate individually. External costs of unsafe airport environs far exceed benefits of unrestricted land use.

This regulation establishes safety zones around Kimmirut Airport in Nunavut, prohibiting building construction, interference with aircraft signals, natural growth, and wildlife-attracting activities within defined imaginary surfaces (approach, outer, strip, transitional). It applies to all lands within a 4,000m radius of the airport reference point.

Aviation safety requires coordinated land-use controls that private liability cannot provide after the fact. This narrowly-targeted regulation prevents catastrophic harm with minimal market distortion—affecting only a 4km radius around a remote community airport—and protects essential transportation infrastructure, lives, and property. Deleting it would expose Canadians to preventable crash risks and jeopardize air connectivity for Kimmirut.

Aviation safety regulations establishing height restrictions and land use controls around Kugaaruk Airport in Nunavut to prevent interference with aircraft operations and ensure safe approaches and departures.

Aviation safety requires clear airspace around airports. Without these height restrictions, buildings or natural growth could penetrate approach paths, creating collision hazards for aircraft. The regulations prevent both physical obstructions and activities that could interfere with navigation signals or attract wildlife near runways.

Regulation creates defined safety zones around Pangnirtung Airport (Nunavut) using imaginary surfaces (approach, outer, strip, transitional) extending up to 4000m radius. Prohibits structures penetrating these surfaces, signal interference, excessive natural growth, and wildlife-attracting activities to ensure aviation safety.

Prevents catastrophic loss of life from aircraft collisions and bird strikes. The narrow, technically-defined restrictions on property use are justified by the overwhelming safety benefits and positive externalities of protected air navigation. Cannot be adequately replaced by post-accident liability or private bargaining given the scale of potential harm and number of affected parties.

Federal airport zoning regulation for Pond Inlet Airport, Nunavut, prohibiting within a 4,000m radius any building/structure/object that penetrates defined approach, outer, strip, or transitional surfaces; any use causing interference with aircraft signals; any natural growth penetrating surfaces; and any activity attracting wildlife hazardous to aviation, with a 48-hour exception for water storage reservoirs.

Deletion would endanger aviation safety by allowing obstructions in critical airspace and wildlife attractants, increasing crash risk. Preemptive spatial restrictions are essential because liability alone cannot prevent catastrophic accidents, especially for vital air service to remote communities.