Browse regulations

This regulation establishes zoning and height restrictions around Sanikiluaq Airport in Nunavut to protect aviation safety. It defines imaginary surfaces (approach, outer, strip, and transitional) that create no-build zones and height limitations for all land within a 4,000-meter radius of the airport. The regulation also prohibits activities that could interfere with aircraft signals or attract wildlife that creates aviation hazards.

Aviation safety requires physical separation between aircraft and obstacles. Without these height restrictions, buildings or structures could penetrate approach paths, creating collision risks during takeoff and landing. The wildlife prohibition prevents bird strikes that have caused fatal accidents. These are fundamental safety requirements that would be difficult to achieve through voluntary measures or market mechanisms, as individual property owners have no incentive to restrict their own development for collective safety benefits.

This regulation establishes imaginary safety surfaces (approach, outer, strip, transitional) around Qikiqtarjuaq Airport in Nunavut, prohibiting buildings, structures, natural growth, wildlife-attracting activities, and signal interference within a 4km radius to protect aviation safety.

Deleting this would expose Nunavut residents and air travelers to catastrophic aviation accident risks. The regulation prevents hazards that could cause plane crashes, which have extreme negative externalities affecting many lives and properties. While it restricts property rights, the safety benefits vastly outweigh the land-use limitations; market mechanisms and liability alone cannot adequately prevent such high-stakes risks given the magnitude of potential harm.

This permit authorizes Canadian residents to export most Group 4 goods/technologies to 38 designated friendly countries, subject to conditions including registration with Export Controls Division, record-keeping for six years, on-demand reporting, and a nuclear license if applicable. It excludes the most sensitive items within Group 4 and does not apply to Area Control List countries.

The permit imposes administrative burdens (registration, record-keeping, reporting) that increase compliance costs and hinder trade. Exports are limited to low-risk, allied destinations and the items are already the least sensitive category, making these conditions disproportionate and protectionist in spirit. The unseen effect is to deter small exporters and distort incentives, while providing negligible additional security beyond existing nuclear licensing requirements.

General Export Permit (GEP-43) authorizes Canadian residents to export Group 3 goods/technologies to 36 eligible countries without individual permits, requiring pre-registration, nuclear licensing for relevant items, six-year record-keeping, and reporting upon request. Excludes items 3-2.1.1/3-2.1.2 and exports to Area Control List countries.

Deletion would force exporters to obtain individual permits for each transaction, imposing significant delays and costs that would harm Canadian competitiveness and reduce export opportunities. The permit achieves the regulatory objective—controlled but efficient trade with allies—more effectively than case-by-case approvals, and its modest record-keeping obligations are outweighed by the trade facilitation benefit.

This regulation grants legal capacities, privileges, and immunities to the International Organization for Migration (IOM) and its representatives in Canada, based on the UN Convention on Privileges and Immunities, to facilitate its operations and independent functioning within Canadian jurisdiction.

Canadians would be worse off if this regulation was deleted because it enables international cooperation on migration issues, protects diplomatic representatives from legal harassment that could impede critical humanitarian work, and ensures Canada can participate effectively in global migration governance frameworks that affect Canadian interests.

Regulations governing alternate appointments in the public service, where indeterminate employees appointed to replace opting employees must submit irrevocable resignations, cannot perform duties, and cease employment upon resignation effect.

Creates a fictitious employment category that undermines job security, potentially circumvents proper layoff procedures, and excludes these positions from key employment protections without serving any productive public purpose. The forced irrevocable resignation requirement is coercive and adds bureaucratic complexity with no legitimate outcome.

Regulation implementing Canada's obligations under MARPOL and other international conventions to prevent marine pollution from ships. It prohibits discharges of oil, noxious liquids, garbage, and air emissions in various waters, requires approved pollution control equipment for vessels in Canadian jurisdiction and Canadian vessels globally, and sets detailed technical standards.

Canadians would be worse off due to increased marine pollution harming fisheries, ecosystems, coastal economies, and public health. The regulation efficiently achieves pollution prevention by leveraging existing international standards that create a level playing field, preventing a race-to-the-bottom while protecting Canada's sovereign waters. Deleting it would cause environmental damage, undermine Canada's international commitments, and impose uncompensated externalities on Canadians.

Regulation implements requirements under Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL) for commercial electronic messages (CEMs). It mandates that senders include clear identification (sender and principal), contact information, and a functional unsubscribe mechanism. For consent, it requires separate requests with full disclosure and the right to withdraw. For software installations, it requires explicit disclosure and written acknowledgment of certain program functions.

This regulation imposes heavy compliance costs on legitimate businesses while achieving minimal marginal deterrence over existing market solutions (email filters, user controls). It creates a regulatory minefield with penalties up to $10 million, chilling legitimate commercial speech and entrepreneurship. The granular consent requirements and disclosure mandates add transaction costs that reduce economic efficiency. Spammers operating in bad faith will simply ignore these rules, while honest businesses bear the burden. Property rights in inboxes can beprotected through technological solutions and common law (trespass to chattels), not blanket federal mandates that suppress electronic commerce and impose deadweight losses on Canada's digital economy.

Temporary 2012 order exempting RCMP from Radiocommunication Act for specific Ontario location during March 2-5, 2012 to allow interference with radiocommunications for security/safety/international relations purposes.

Expired 13 years ago; keeping obsolete time-limited orders creates confusion and regulatory clutter with no public benefit. Formal repeal maintains legal clarity and reduces unintended costs of maintaining irrelevant statutes.

Regulatory framework for Pooled Registered Pension Plans (PRPPs) in Canada, defining terms, investment rules, administrative requirements, and oversight mechanisms for employer-sponsored retirement savings vehicles.

Canadians would be worse off if PRPPs were deleted as this regulation provides low-cost, accessible retirement savings options for workers without existing pension plans, with standardized rules that protect members while allowing efficient administration.

This regulation incorporates by reference numerous British Columbia statutes and regulations to apply to the Bees Indian Reserve No. 6, creating a comprehensive regulatory framework for environmental protection, public health, safety, and resource management with various adaptations favoring the Haisla Nation and federal government.

This regulation imposes massive regulatory burdens through wholesale incorporation of dozens of BC laws, creating costly compliance requirements, reducing development flexibility, and stifling economic activity on reserve lands. The same legitimate objectives could be achieved with simpler, outcome-based rules that protect property rights without the unseen costs of delays, increased expenses, and forgone economic opportunity.

This Regulation prohibits the manufacture, use, sale, and import of specific toxic substances listed in Schedules 1 and 2, except for incidental presence. It provides exemptions for laboratory research, military operations, certain industrial processes (e.g., semiconductor manufacturing), and products with low concentrations. A permit system allows continued use if no feasible alternative exists and harm mitigation measures are implemented, alongside reporting and record-keeping requirements.

This regulation imposes significant compliance costs, bureaucratic delays, and discretionary permit requirements that stifle innovation and competitiveness. Its blanket prohibition ignores property rights and market-based solutions like liability, while the central planning of 'feasible alternatives' fails due to the knowledge problem. Unseen consequences include supply disruptions, higher consumer prices, and lost economic opportunity, outweighing any marginal environmental benefits.

This regulation establishes eligibility criteria for mortgage loans to be insured by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). It defines key terms like high ratio loans (>80% LTV), low ratio loans (≤80% LTV), debt service ratios, and credit score requirements. The regulation sets maximum loan-to-value ratios (up to 95% for high ratio loans), amortization period limits (25 years generally, 30 years for first-time buyers/new builds), property value caps ($1.5M for high ratio, $1M for low ratio), minimum credit scores (600), and maximum debt service ratios (39% GDS, 44% TDS). It also includes provisions for loans to add housing units and various transitional rules for loans originated during specific time periods.

This regulation represents government intervention in private lending markets that distorts risk assessment and pricing. By guaranteeing mortgages that private insurers might reject, it creates moral hazard, encouraging lenders to make riskier loans and borrowers to overextend. The arbitrary thresholds (LTV ratios, property value caps, amortization limits) replace market-determined risk premiums with bureaucratic mandates, artificially inflating housing demand and prices. Taxpayers bear the risk of defaults while the regulation suppresses the natural discipline that would come from lenders bearing full risk. The criteria interfere with voluntary contracts between willing parties, reducing options for borrowers who might qualify under different terms with private insurers. Housing affordability would improve long-term if lenders and borrowers faced the full consequences of their risk choices rather than socializing losses through government insurance.

Regulation establishes eligibility criteria for government-backed mortgage insurance in Canada, governing high-ratio loans (LTV > 80%), low-ratio loans, and loans for adding housing units. It sets maximum loan-to-value ratios, amortization periods (25 years, 30 for first-time buyers/new builds), debt service ratio limits (GDS 39%, TDS 44%), minimum credit scores (600 with narrow exceptions), property value caps ($1.5M high-ratio, $2M for addition loans), and requires owner-occupancy. The regulation also mandates income verification and contains numerous grandfathering provisions for loans originated during specific historical periods.

This regulation distorts housing markets by artificially enabling low-down-payment borrowing, fueling price inflation. It substitutes government risk assessment for private lender judgment, creating moral hazard. The owner-occupancy mandate restricts property rights and reduces rental supply. Credit score floors and debt ratio caps arbitrarily exclude creditworthy borrowers. These interventions raise barriers to entry, reduce mobility, and prevent market-clearing prices. Canadians would be better served by eliminating government insurance altogether, allowing private parties to negotiate risk, terms, and down payments voluntarily. The regulation's costs include higher prices, misallocation of capital, and institutionalized interference with property rights.

These Guidelines establish the framework for determining whether an acquisition of a federal credit union would result in control by a person, based on cooperative principles, transparency, member oversight, and financial stability objectives. The guidelines define evaluation factors including ownership structure, board composition, business relationships, and ability to influence operations.

These guidelines create unnecessary regulatory burden by imposing complex control determination frameworks that restrict voluntary business arrangements and investment flows. The factors listed (board composition, family relationships, ability to veto proposals) represent excessive micromanagement of cooperative governance that would be better handled through market mechanisms and contractual arrangements. The stated objectives of 'preserving cooperative benefits' and 'lessening risk of distortions' are paternalistic interventions that prevent efficient capital allocation and investment decisions that could improve financial services for Canadians.